« Robot boxing | Main | Christmas gift round up »

Bookmark in Connotea

Dinosaur of the day – mummified-o-saurus - December 03, 2007

DinoAutopsy_31.jpgA dinosaur complete with skin, tendons and perhaps even internal organs has been uncovered in the US. Although it is being billed as “mummified”, the skin and tissues on this hadrosaur have actually been turned to stone. Crucially however, they have been preserved.

“This is not a skin impression,” Phil Manning of the University of Manchester told Reuters. “This is fossilized skin. When you run your hands over this dinosaur's skin, this is the closest you are going to get to touching a real dinosaur, ever.”

Rapid deposition of mineral-rich sand over the carcass of ‘Dakota’ probably preserved the tissue (press release, photo gallery).

The fossil was originally discovered by grad student Tyler Lyson in North Dakota in 1990, hence the imaginative name. In 2004 he returned to it and uncovered the skin. At that point Manning was called in. “When I first saw it in the field, (I thought) ‘Shiiiit, that's a really well preserved dinosaur’,” he says (Wired).

After being encased in plaster the beast was hauled to a giant CT scanner for analysis of the tissue. And this tissue could force us to reassess a lot of what we though about dinosaurs. For starters the dinosaur’s rump was larger than had been thought from other specimens. That means it could run faster than had been thought, comfortably leaving T Rex in its dust. Its vertebrae were also more spaced out than was thought to have been the case, which may force up estimates of overall size (Daily Telegraph, Washington Post, Times).

No peer reviewed studies on Dakota have been published as yet but it does feature on a forthcoming National Geographic TV programme (for US readers: Dino Autopsy, National Geographic Channel, December 9 at 9 p.m. EST/10 p.m. PT).

This isn’t the first time dinosaur soft tissue has been detected, previous examples surfacing in Nature itself (in Italy and in China). It remains to be seen where this new find leaves the bald vs feathers debate.

Image: National Geographic Channel / Television

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4014