« Climate: hoaxes and divorced Canadian drunks | Main | Elephant news triple bill »

Bookmark in Connotea

FDA’s lack of science ‘puts lives at risk’ - December 04, 2007

FDA logo.gifScience at the US drug regulator is simply not up to the job of keeping America safe. This is the worrying conclusion of a new report by the Food and Drug Administration’s own science advisory committee (report PDF).

“The wheels are coming off. In fact, I would say they're off. They’re already off,” said report co-author Gail Cassel (ABC).

The FDA Science and Mission at Risk report comes on the back of numerous incidents that have raised questions about the agency’s ability to function. Indeed, the FDA’s own reports have previously warned that without budget increases it would be pushed to do its job. The new report says this is already happening (USA Today).

The report states, “science at the FDA is in a precarious position: the Agency suffers from serious scientific deficiencies and is not positioned to meet current or emerging regulatory responsibilities”. Also in the report is this rather important point: “FDA’s inability to keep up with scientific advances means that American lives are at risk.”

For sheer impact it’s hard to beat the key findings:

- The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific base has eroded and its scientific organizational structure is weak.
- The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its scientific workforce does not have sufficient capacity and capability.
- The FDA cannot fulfill its mission because its information technology (IT) infrastructure is inadequate.

At the Huffington Post, Doug Bremner thinks he knows what the problem is: “I think it is time we turned the FDA back into what it was supposed to be: an agency that protects you and me from unnecessary risks from food and drugs, not a cheerleader for private industry.”

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4034