« Christmas gift round up | Main | ‘Nazi’ rocket man’s PhD for sale »

Bookmark in Connotea

Shuttle replacement problems surface - December 04, 2007

AresNASA.jpgPlans for the replacement of the aging and ailing Space Shuttle are looking pretty shaky following a report from the US congressional spending watchdog. The Government Accountability Office says there are “gaps in the knowledge about requirements, costs, schedule, technology, design, and production feasibility” for the Ares I rocket. Which seems to me to be just about all of it.

“While NASA still has 10 months under its own schedule to close gaps in knowledge about requirements, technologies, costs, and time and other elements needed to develop the Ares I system, the gaps we identified are fairly significant and challenging given the complexity and interdependencies in the program,” says the report.

Democrat Bart Gordon, chairman of the House Committee on Science and Technology Chairman, commissioned the report. “GAO’s assessment is a mix of good news and not-so-good news,” he says (press release). “On the one hand, GAO has concluded that NASA is taking steps to demonstrate that the Ares I project is achievable within the constraints that the project faces. On the other hand, GAO has identified a number of significant challenges that will have to be overcome if the project is to succeed.”

The Space Politics blog notes the reports concerns about the budget for the Constellation programme, which includes both the Ares I launcher and the Orion crew vehicle. Comments on the blog raise the spectre of the Columbia disaster, where planning problems are thought to have contributed to the accident.

Image: Ares artistic impression / NASA

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4030