« Happy Birthday Charles | Main | Pretty astronomy pictures »

Bookmark in Connotea

Dino of the day: mini-flying-cute-osaurus - February 12, 2008

miniflyingthing.jpgA tiny flying dinosaur reptile* has been unearthed by palaeontologists working in China. This new species of pterosaur has a wingspan of just 25 centimetres, making it one of the smallest ever found.

As Wired notes, “to judge by the illustrated rendition, it was very adorable”. The NY Times agrees, calling it “the cutest little 120-million-year-old flying reptile you could ever hope to see”

It’s not clear how big and how ugly the thing would have got if it had stayed alive a bit longer. Study author Xiaolin Wang, of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, notes in the PNAS paper presenting the animal that it has several features indicating it is not fully grown. For instance some of its cranial bones are unfused.

However Wang insists it is not a hatchling just out of the egg, in part because several bones which are generally fragile in juveniles are well preserved. Named Nemicolopterus crypticus, the fossil was unearthed in western Liaoning, in the East of China.

miniflyingthingmap.jpg

The new species is also interesting because it seems to be adapted for living in trees. This is inferred from its claws and toe bones, which appear to be adapted to hanging on to branches.

“The fundamental importance of this discovery is that it opens a new chapter in the history of evolution of flying reptiles. Until now, it was unknown that some of these animals had these adaptations to live on tree canopies,” says co-author Alexander Kellner, of the Rio de Janeiro Federal University’s National Museum (BBC).

As the Guardian notes, this new species isn’t quite the smallest pterosaur ever. A hatchling found in Germany has a wingspan of just 18 centimetres.

*see comment below.

Image top: reconstruction of Nemicolopterus crypticus / courtesy of Michael Skrepnickaption.
Map: courtesy of PNAS/National Academy of Sciences

Comments

This is a pterosaur, not a dinosaur. Pterosaurs are probably closely related to dinosaurs, but are not themselves dinosaurs.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4466