« The Chemical Element Elephant | Main | Science sounds round up »

Bookmark in Connotea

Endangered animals: it’s worse than we thought - July 03, 2008

This story is also discussed on this week’s Nature Podcast.

A mathematical glitch means we’ve been massively underestimating how at risk endangered species are, according to a paper in this week’s Nature (paper, press coverage).

By failing to include random variations in individuals within a species, such as size and male-to-female sex ratios, risk estimates have been out by up to 100 times, say Brett Melbourne, of the University of Colorado at Boulder, and Alan Hasting, of the University of California, Davis. Which means animals like the Sumatran tiger could go extinct 100 times faster than we thought.

“This seems subtle and technical, but it turns out to be important,” Melbourne told AFP.

After developing new models that did incorporate some of the missing factors, Melbourne and Hastings confirmed them experimentally using a population of beetles in their lab.

“When we apply our new mathematical model to species extinction rates, it shows that things are worse than we thought,” says Melbourne (press release). “By accounting for random differences between individuals, extinction rates for endangered species can be orders of magnitude higher than conservation biologists have believed.”

This could have big implications for the IUCN, which manages the endangered species ‘red list’.

“We are certainly underestimating the number of species that are in danger of becoming extinct because there are around 1.8m described species and we’ve only been able to assess 41,000 of those,” says Craig Hilton-Taylor, of the IUCN (Guardian). “We are constantly looking at how we evaluate extinction risk, and it may be they have hit on something that can help us.”

Nancy Tcheou, who is acknowledged in the paper, says (of her acknowledgement), “I guess working in the beetle lab for more than a year kinda pays off… in addition to the fact that I’ve counted to 50 more times than countable. Just beetles. Yep.”

Comments

The effective population size [Ne]-the number of individuals which actually participate in breeding are dwindling at very fast rate paving their way to extinction.This is really an alarming situation which warrants an immediate attention from every one concerned with the issue.Something has to be done concrete and that too very urgently before it is too late.We can build a world heritage monument if ,god forbid me ,it is destroyed but we can not build a wild species if it has got extinct as the contemporary bio- tech is still imperfect in resurrecting an extinct species.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5509