« On Nature News: sleep loss and autism | Main | Kidney stones: an inconvenient truth »

Bookmark in Connotea

Hatfill case update: NY Times case dismissed - July 15, 2008

Last month we noted that the US government had agreed to pay $5.8 million to Steven Hatfill, a bio-defence researcher who was linked to the 2001 anthrax incidents by the media.

Hatfill was identified as a suspect despite there being, in one judge’s words, “not a scintilla of evidence” that he was involved. However a federal appeals court has confirmed the dismissal of his defamation suit against the New York Times.

The Times says:

Under a landmark 1964 Supreme Court ruling, a public figure must demonstrate that a publication acted with “actual malice” to succeed in a defamation suit. That meant that Dr. Hatfill had to show that The Times knew or suspected that any suggestion he was involved in the anthrax attacks was false and published the articles anyway.

More coverage
New York Times wins ruling in anthrax libel case – Reuters
Dismissal of Suit Over Anthrax Stories Upheld – Washington Post

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5608