« Procedural deficiencies, eh? | Main | Garnaut mania takes over Australia »

Bookmark in Connotea

Octopus vs Rubik’s cube - July 07, 2008

octopus rubik corbis.JPGrubiks cube cc.jpgScientists have given octopuses Rubik’s cubes in an attempt to determine if they have a favourite tentacle, or if they are octidextrous (a word that seems to have been invented specifically for this story).

According to a number of British papers around 25 octopuses at aquariums across Europe will be given toys and visitors will be asked to record which arm they are using to play with them, using a diagram showing the arms as R1, R2, R3, R4 and L1, L2, L3, L4.

“Uniquely, octopuses have more than half their nerves in their arms and have been shown to partially think with their arms,” says Claire Little, of the Weymouth Sea Life Centre (Independent). “Many animals have been shown to favour a certain arm so we will see if octopuses can be added to that list.”

According to Little, the findings could help make life in captivity more pleasant for these intelligent, (and occasionally shark eating), animals. “They are very susceptible to stress, so if they do have a favourite side to be fed on, it could reduce risk to them,” she says (Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail).

No one has suggested that any of the octopuses will actually solve the puzzle, but there’s a very slim chance they might. At the risk of re-igniting the now dormant ‘Echinoderms or Molluscs’ blog war, show us a starfish that can do that…

Images: Octopus – Corbis / Rubik’s cube – photo by Culture-Culte via flickr and under Creative Commons

Comments

I suspect the Rubik's Cube may be better suited for favorable attention by the media than by the octopuses themselves. It's well known that octopuses are clever, nimble escape artists and occasional (if accidental) puzzle solvers from the Lobster in a Corked Jar experiment.

Do octopuses show a particular penchant for Rubik's Cubes, more than, say, plastic easter eggs? In his book 'The Soft Intelligence,' I seem to remember Jacques Cousteau suggesting that some octopuses show a penchant for collecting objects, but that those choices were highly individual.

Someone will probably get a PhD in Biology for discovering this worthless bit of trivia and writing about it.

"Octidextrous" appears only in this story because the word is actually "octodextrous."

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5523

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Octopus vs Rubik’s cube:

» Octopuses play with Rubik's Cubes from Boing Boing
Researchers from the Weymouth Sea Life Centre are providing octopuses with Rubik's cubes to determine whether the animals prefer one tentacle over another, or another, or another, etc. I bet they secretly hope that one of the animals will solve the puz... [Read More]