« On Nature News: bird flu, fossil fish, and the G8 | Main | Giant airship’s eco-credentials »

Bookmark in Connotea

The strange case of the young wolf - July 10, 2008

Lupa Capitolina.jpgIt’s being claimed that a cherished Italian myth was shattered yesterday when the final blow was delivered to the origin story of Rome’s most famous statue, the Lupa Capitolina.

Experts have been chipping away for some time at claims that an iconic bronze showing a she-wolf suckling Romulus and Remus dates back to the 5th Century BC. The Romulus and Remus parts of the statue had already been dismissed as later works and doubts about the Lupa have been raised due to the method used to create it, which wasn’t thought to be known in the 5th century BC.

Yesterday Adriano La Regina, a former heritage official in Rome, said 20 tests had demonstrated that it was definitely a 13th century creation in an article in La Repubblica. La Regina says that the analysis was conducted last year, but the results were never published.

According to his article a battery of tests proves the 13th century date of the statue.

The Guardian and the Independent highlight his statement that radiocarbon tests were used in their coverage. Can you radiocarbon date bronze? It would seem unlikely to me but I’m open to correction in the comments. Anyway Rome e-magazine Eternally Cool notes that La Regina also says thermoluminescence tests were performed, which seems more feasible.

As previously noted on the Great Beyond and in the pages of Science though, the “lupa” that raised Romulus and Remus was probably not a wolf but a “very prosperous sex worker”.

Image: via Wikipedia

Comments

In my opinion, such as news is really significant and particularly useful for Rome and Italy population.Fortunately, after a long time of myth, we are slowly realizing our real history origin. I ask myself, however, if Romulus and Remus were involved, or ot by Oncological, diabetic, hypertensive biophysical-semeiotic constitutions and their INHERITED Real Risk. Unfortunately, no scientist in Rome is knowing these "trivial" congenital disorders.

That would be "puta", then - rather than "lupa"...?

regards the carbon testing of bronze... perhaps there are organic deposits in the crevices of the statue[s]? if they were tested however, they would post-date the original statue anyway...

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5570