« On Nature News | Main | EPA turns the screw on lead emissions »

Bookmark in Connotea

The LHC: what went wrong - October 16, 2008

CERN, the particle-physics laboratory near Geneva, has released its report on what went wrong on 19 September, just as the Large Hadron Collider was firing up. Blame a bad electrical connection that led to the vacuum enclosure rupturing. The full report is a rather grim litany of engineering gone awry: "soot-like dust", it turns out, contaminated the beam pipes "over some distance".

The LHC (Nature special here) won't start working now until spring 2009 -- not a happy delay for the particle physicists who have waited for it for years.

Comments

This may also be a good time for most researchers here to take time off, remove their blinkers, and check out what else have happened around them in the field.
Clearly, the LHC was conceived with the goal of answering some vexing fundamental questions. However, the most important conceptual breakthrough - of the breathing atom - emerged (without grants!) only subsequently. This has required a review of the entire field of our so-called modern quantum theory.
Let's here quickly consider a typical item pertaining to the LHC: the 'God' particle, or Higgs boson, that is expected to debut here. This is now seen as a fundamental nonentity. But, hark, there is indeed a particle that truly deserves that nomenclature: the hitherto unrecognized per-cycle quantum of the photon. For this final perspective on the nature of things, do spare a few more minutes of your time to peruse its one-page summary, on www.sittampalam.net/Summary.pdf.
Thank you.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6412