« On Nature News | Main | ‘Souped-up, pimped up, bionic assassin cells search-and-destroy HIV’ »

Bookmark in Connotea

Dino dance floor disputed - November 10, 2008

dino dance doubt.jpgPosted for Emma Marris

Regular readers of this blog will remember a post about a cool palaeontology finding: more than 1,000 dinosaur footprints preserved on a three-quarter acre site in the US Southwest. We also mentioned that there was a whiff of doubt about the so-called "dinosaur dance floor". One scientist thought that the features could be geologically-formed potholes rather than the lasting impressions of a sauropod samba.

A week after the find was publicized, on October 30th, four curious palaeontologists hiked to the site and, well, they weren't impressed. “There simply are no tracks or real track-like features at this site,” said Brent Breithaupt, director and curator of the University of Wyoming’s Geological Museum. So maybe they were potholes after all.

The original team has graciously offered to team up with the doubters to further examine the site.

University of Utah press release.

Image: footprint or pothole? Winston Seiler / University of Utah

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6576