« On Nature News | Main | Credit crunch chills climate change choices »

Bookmark in Connotea

No LHC before 2010? - November 27, 2008

lhc_repair.jpgUpdate: James Gillies, CERN's spokesperson, is refuting the rumor. The slide in question was "one guy's speculation," he says. In fact, CERN is still aiming for collisions in mid-2009, although not at the full design energy of 7 TeV. A full report on the incident is expected soon.

The world's biggest, newest particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider, may be out of service for the entirety of 2009.

The LHC was knocked out of commission earlier this fall, after an electrical fault caused extensive damage to one of its eight sectors. A substantial part of the damage was caused by the liquid helium used to cool the machine, which escaped its cryostat and vaporized--causing an enormous pressure build up.

A couple of blogs have taken note of a presentation given by Jörg Wenninger of the lab's beam department, in which he apparently claimed the machine may not restart until 2010. That would allow CERN's accelerator team to install pressure relief valves on the entirety of the LHC machine. 2009 might still be an option, but it would be later in the summer and at lower energies than originally planned.

For my money I'm guessing that most physicists would like to see some collisions next year. Even if they don't yield new discoveries, they can still be used to calibrate the detectors (and write a few theses).

It should be said that the actual plan is a little unclear. The slide shown here comes from the Resonaances blog, it does not appear in the current online version of Wenninger's presentation, although there's a blank page near the bottom where some say it should be.

Comments

Hooray! The longer this thing is out of commission, the better.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6747