« AQ Khan Walks | Main | Songs about science XIII: ‘This stuff is far!’ »

Bookmark in Connotea

Antarctic ice’s American inundation amplification - February 06, 2009

water ice.jpgYou might think that if/when the huge ice sheet in West Antarctica melts, sea levels around the world will rise by roughly the same amount everywhere. You’d be wrong.

You’d be in good company though. Some predictions – including the influential Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment Reports – have also assumed that meltwater will spread uniformly.

In this week’s issue of Science researchers report that some parts of the world – such as the United States – would see much more of a rise than others. Their paper – which draws on an apparently much overlooked work in Nature from 1977 – says US coastal states will see a sea level rise 30% higher than the uniform rise – called the effective eustatic value – estimates.

“When an ice sheet melts, sea level does not change uniformly,” says Jerry Mitrovica, a geophysicist at the University of Toronto (Globe and Mail). “You get this whopping amplification of sea-level rise in North America.”

The problem, say the authors, is that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is so big is actually has a gravitational attraction large enough to pull water towards it. “The net effect, despite the increase in the total volume of the oceans after a melting event, is that sea level will actually fall within 2000 km of the collapsing ice sheet and progressively increase as one moves further from this region,” write the authors.

ice melt.bmp

In addition the sheer weight of ice is forcing down the land underneath it and having an impact on the Earth’s spin. When the ice is removed up bounces the land and the Earth moves.

“Consider Washington, DC, and the case where we adopt the conventional value of 5 m for the EEV,” they say. “We predict a sea-level rise 1.3 m higher than the EEV (or 6.3 m total) at this site, an increase above the EEV that is three times greater than predicted using the standard sea-level theory.”

On the plus side DC-ites: this scenario is a ways away: “It’s a time scale of hundreds of years”, says Mitrovica (Reuters).

Headline watch
About that beach house... – LA Times

Photo: by shioshvili via Flickr under creative commons
Graphic: Jerry Mitrovica & Natalya Gomez, University of Toronto

Comments

National Geographic (November 19, 2008)- Dark Matter Proof Found Over Antarctica?:
High-energy electrons captured over Antarctica could reveal the presence of a nearby but MYSTERIOUS ASTROPHYSICAL OBJECT that's bombarding Earth with cosmic rays, researchers say... LiveScience (06 June 2008)- Antarctic Ice Causes Glacial 'Earthquakes':
Scientists have discovered their first icequake, if you will — a movement of a huge stream of ice in Antarctica that creates seismic waves, just like an earthquake, and can be felt hundreds of miles away... These ice-driven seismic waves had the force of a magnitude 7 earthquake:
http://cristiannegureanu.blogspot.com/2009/02/livescience-antarctic-meltdown-would.html

Interesting article — but why is the piece titled “Antarctic ice’s American inundation amplification,” particularly in a British journal? Surely most everywhere in the northern hemisphere (and to a lesser degree the southern) — such as Europe — would experience similar higher sea level gains than one would naively expect (from the sheer quantity of water liberated from the melting of the West Antarctic ice sheet), not just North America.

Moreover, if and when the Greenland ice sheet melts (as indeed there's reason to believe it largely did during the most recent, Eemian interglacial) then surely the same effect would operate in reverse, with higher sea levels than naively predictable occurring most notably in the southern hemisphere. Will the corresponding article in Nature blogs be entitled “Greenland ice's African inundation amplification”? Why not Australian or South American (or would it still be just plain “American”) instead?

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/7327