« China commits to ‘carbon intensity’ reduction | Main | Skin fills in what your ear can hear »

Bookmark in Connotea

Tiger decline numbers disputed - November 26, 2009

tiger tiger.JPGSiberian tiger numbers are down 40% on their 12-year average, according to a new report from the Wildlife Conservation Society.

WCS scientists recorded only 56 tigers at their 16 monitoring sites, these cover 15–18% of existing tiger habitat in Russia. The total number of Siberian tigers across the entire range was estimated at 500 in 2005, says the WCS, but there has been a four year decline in numbers.

“The sobering results are a wake-up call that current conservation efforts are not going far enough to protect Siberian tigers,” says Dale Miquelle, of the WCS Russian Far East Program (press release).

Not everyone agrees with the numbers though, partly because heavy snow may have reduced the movements of some of the big cats.

“It is absolutely incorrect,” says Vladimir Krever, of the World Wildlife Fund (AP). “There’s possibly been a decrease in the last two years, but definitely not 40 percent.”

The animal is listed as endangered - but not critically endangered - by the IUCN's Red List, which says "according to a comprehensive 2005 population census, there are 331-393 adult-subadult Amur tigers in the Russian Far East".

In other Siberian tiger news, a spokesman for Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin has stated that one of the giant cats that Putin helped fit with a radio collar earlier this year is alive and well. Earlier reports stated the tiger had ‘vanished’.

Image: ‘Lutka’, photographed in Russia / Dale Miquelle/Wildlife Conservation Society

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9959