Of Schemes and Memes Blog
Further experiments in peer review
There is a post on the Scholarly Kitchen blog this week that asks: “how can we improve the article review and submission process?” For all of us involved in scientific and scholarly publishing, it has long been accepted that peer review is necessary and beneficial in ensuring the quality of scientific communication. But it is also seen by many as an imperfect system: less efficient than it should be and sometimes frustratingly slow.
Recent comments on this blog
Noticed some changes? Introducing the new Nature Research brand
Promoting research data sharing at Springer Nature
Update on Scientific Reports Fast Track Experiment