« Standards of statistical analysis | Main | Peer-review of work by "interested parties" »

Bookmark in Connotea

Peer to Peer is welcomed

Peer-to-Peer and Nautilus have received their first welcome to the scientific blogosphere from outside the Nature Publishing Group. At Blog Around the Clock, Coturnix, er, welcomes us here. Lukman has added a comment: "Thanks for this great info. Your blog is very informative for science development for ordinary people like us."

In an earlier post, Coturnix writes about the upcoming 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging conference, part of the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. From the society's website: "Popular political and social commentary blogs are making the news, but is there more out there than chatty gossip and collections of links? How about some science? Can this trendy technology be useful for scientists? Come to the Media Workshop and find out ....about how blogging works, setting one up, finding things to write about, and using the medium for your classes, for research, or for educating the public."

Correction: The session on science blogging at SCIB is on January 4th in Phoenix, AZ, while the 1.5-day Science Blogging Conference is on January 20th in Chapel Hill, NC. (Thanks to Coturnix for pointing this out.)

Comments

You are welcome. But, the two events are separate. The session on science blogging at SCIB is on January 4th in Phoenix, AZ, while the 1.5-day Science Blogging Conference is on January 20th in Chapel Hill, NC.

Hey, we Welcomed you too. I'm looking forward to your insights on the peer review process.

Thank you, Dave -- sorry to miss your welcome. I will have to have a stern word with my rss reader. It was very kind of you to give us a mention.

No problem. My RSS reader and I aren't on speaking terms.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'referees at nature.com'.

please enter code