« Access to the literature and peer review | Main | Politics and peer review in climate research »

Bookmark in Connotea

Annals of Internal Medicine announces policy on research reproducibility

The editors of the Annals of Internal Medicine announce a new policy on reproducibility of research findings in the current (20 March) issue of the journal. From the summary:

"A community of scientists arrives at the truth by independently verifying new observations. In this time-honored process, journals serve 2 principal functions: evaluative and editorial. In their evaluative function, they winnow out research that is unlikely to stand up to independent verification; this task is accomplished by peer review. In their editorial function, they try to ensure transparent (by which we mean clear, complete, and unambiguous) and objective descriptions of the research. Both the evaluative and editorial functions go largely unnoticed by the public—the former only draws public attention when a journal publishes fraudulent research."

The article goes on to discuss the existing strategies used by the journal to guard against publication of invalid or biased research, and announces new policies to increase confidence in published research. "Every original research article will include a statement that indicates whether the study protocol, data, or statistical code is available to readers and under what terms authors will share this information. Sharing will not be mandatory, but we will require authors to state whether they are willing to share the protocol, data, or statistical code."

The Nature journals' policy on availablity of materials is described at our Author and Referees' website.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'referees at nature.com'.

please enter code