« Comment on Heredity papers | Main | Academic value systems in scholarly communication »

Bookmark in Connotea

The cathedral and the bazaar

Picking up on the Nature Structural and Molecular Biology Editorial "New data at conferences, please", discussed here last week, Mario Pineda-Krch writes on his blog (Mario's Entangled Bank) about how the idea of the conference as a type of open peer-review process reminds him of the 1997 essay The academic Cathedral and the Bazaar by Eric S. Raymond.

In the Cathedral model the research process occurs behind closed doors among a exclusive group of researchers where progress is reported in peer-reviewed publications. In the Bazaar model the research is conducted in full view of the public......The basic tenet of the Bazaar model has in the field of software development termed Linus' law, i.e. "given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow". In an academic research environment the pros of the Bazaar model hinge on the fact that the more widely available the your research methodology and results is for public testing, scrutiny, and experimentation, the more rapidly all forms of errors and omissions will be discovered. In contrast, in the Cathedral model an inordinate amount of time and energy must be spent hunting for errors due to the limited number of eyeballs.

Mario, a postdoctoral researcher who works on ecological population dynamics at the University of California, Davis, believes that "academia would be a better place if more people would embrace this type of openness. Maybe the conferences setting could be the natural stage where the Bazaar movement could start."

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'referees at nature.com'.

please enter code