« Nature Medicine guidelines for reviewers | Main | NIH grant-assessment system under review »

Bookmark in Connotea

NSF workshop on broader impacts of science and technology

The National Science Foundation (NSF) held a research workshop "Making sense of the broader impacts of science and technology" earlier this month (5 - 7 August), to reflect on why (rather than how) scientists and engineers ought to address the broader impacts of their research. A preliminary report of the workshop is now available (PDF).

The NSF recently changed its "merit review" criteria to require scientists to address these broader impacts, and the workshop was held to explain why the criteria were changed, and to address some key questions, including:
How much freedom should the scientific and engineering community be granted to set the terms of its research?
Why is "the integration of research and education" an important value scientists and engineers ought to uphold? What would such integration actually entail?
Why should scientists and engineers seek to expand the participation of underrepresented groups?
What are the links between science and politics?
Why should scientists and engineers worry about the broader impacts of their research? Do scientists and engineers have a responsibility to pursue research directed toward pressing societal needs when their research is publicly funded?
Is basic research in science and engineering value-neutral?
Do other funding agencies ask applicants to talk about societal benefits?
How can basic researchers articulate the broader impacts of their research?
What does "broader impacts" mean anyway?
The organisers of the NSF meeting welcome your comments and suggestions on the preliminary report and on the questions discussed.

Posted by Maxine Clarke on August 22, 2007
Categories: Policy and Public | | Comments (2)

Comments

NSF one of the most reliable workshop in monitoring the broader impacts of science and technology to people.

Posted by: Technology | August 23, 2007 01:03 AM

I think it is important to note that this was an NSF _supported_ workshop, but it was not run by the National Science Foundation staff; rather, the workshop was run by PIs funded with a grant from the Science & Society Program at NSF.

Posted by: Laurel Smith-Doerr | August 23, 2007 11:47 AM

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'referees at nature.com'.

please enter code

Search