« Should I stay or should I go? | Main | Under the tongue »

Bookmark in Connotea

Is it better to go Live?

Live virus vaccines better mimic the natural course of infection and so generate superior immunity to killed or inactivated virus. Yet uptake of the Live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has been low, due to fears over the safety of the vaccine and the ability of the attenuated virus to transmit from person-to-person.

Now a review from the Mayo Clinic hopes to dispel these myths and promote wider acceptance of the vaccine. If more people were given LAIV over the inactivated virus it would give greater protection within the community, generating so-called ‘herd immunity’. With that in mind – would you go live?

Posted by Jen Middleton on January 31, 2008
Categories: | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4393

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'avianflu at nature.com'.

please enter code