The Niche is a blog hosted by Nature Reports Stem Cells to provide an informal forum for debate and commentary on stem cell research and its wider implications for ethics, policy, business, and medicine. Please email the editors at 'theniche at nature.com' to propose new posts.

Bookmark in Connotea

ISSCR sessions from Barrandon and Mikkola: thymus makes skins, SCL starts up HSCs

Note: These accounts of talks given at ISSCR were written by Andrea Ditadi.

Yann Barrandon: Thymus cells make skin, hair follicles

The skin, vagina, cornea, esophagus and other organs in contact with external environment, no matter their germ layer of origin, are all covered with stratified epithelium. Such epithelium is characterized by cells that undergo constant self-renewal. Yann Barrandon of Lausanne University Medical School reported some years ago that this long-term renewal was due to a population of multipotent, clonogenic stem cells. (Claudinot et al 2005, PNAS). These cells persist in niches and proliferate according to environmental cues. In vitro, these stem cells form colonies that can be serially cultured and transplanted. They can also generate all epithelial structures, including the hair follicle and sebaceous gland. Cells from the stratified epithelium of different tissues express a common pattern of genes. The thymic epithelium, which does not come into contact with the external environment, is not as well studied.
Reports that the cell-cycle regulator p63 is required for both stratified and thymic epithelium to develop suggested that they may share a similar progenitor. When Barrandon focused his attention on thymic epithelial cells (TEC), he found a subpopulation of rat TEC (0.1-0.5%) that are clonogenic and can be serially passaged. Those TEC progenitors can be recovered from both embryonic and postnatal thymuses.
In contrast to progenitors in stratified epithelium, cultured clonogenic progenitors generally maintain their “thymus identity” but also express epithelial/hair markers. Barrandon combined epithelial cells from both skin and thymus and transplanted these under the kidney capsules in immunodeficient mice. However, while epithelial progenitors cannot contribute to thymus development, thymic TEC progenitors can form thymus as well as skin and even complex skin structures like hair follicles.
In a serial transplantation experiment, recovered TEC progenitors from secondary recipients retain a thymic “signature” expressing almost all the ordinary thymic genes. All the results Barrandon showed suggest that thymic epithelium may contain a very immature multipotent epithelial progenitor with a broader spectrum of potential than epithelial stem cells. And it can be speculated that thymic and stratified epithelia derive from the same precursor, even though their position and function are totally different. In any case, understanding how the skin forms complex structures could lead to improvements in skin grafts and treatments for other skin diseases.


Session info
Barrandon Yann
Lausanne University Medical School and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne
IMPACT OF MICROENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES ON EPITHELIAL STEM CELL FATE
Plenary 36. Growth Control in Stem Cells and Cancer Plenary V

Getting HSCs started with transcription factor SCL

Gereige Laurraine, a student in Hanna Mikkola’s lab at UCLA brings new light on the function of SCL/Tal1, a well known transcription factor required for hematopoiesis. Though mouse embryos lacking the gene for SCL die 9.5 days postconception for lack of blood cells, SCL appears dispensable thereafter for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) development and function.

Laurraine first used ES cells to create hemangioblasts, precursors of both hematopoietic and endothelial cells. To discover which genes SCL targets, she performed Chip-on-chip analyses to compare cells that both expressed and lacked the SCL gene. These analyses indicated that SCL plays a dual role: it activates major hematopoietic transcription factors that promote the development and maintenance of HSC, and it represses transcription factors critical for the specification of other mesodermal fates. (More specifically, SCL activates factors including Gata2, C-myb, Fli1, Lyl1, Tel, Gfi1, Sox17, and represses factors including those that promote cardiac lineages [Gata4, Tbx20] as well as mesenchymal lineages [Foxf1a, PDGF-R-alpha].) Analysis of the acetylation and methylation of candidate SCL target genes in the ES-cell derived hemangioblasts confirmed the activation of hematopoietic genes and the repression of alternative mesodermal ones.
Laurraine was able to abolish SCL expression at a later point in development (She used a Cre-lox system tied to the expression of hematopoietic marker vav). She showed that the number of adult HSC (isolated as murine Lin- ckit+ bone marrow cells) was not affected, and that other HSC genes like Lyl1, Gfi1, C-myb were still expressed even in the absence of SCL. Her results confirm that, once hematopoietic specification occurs, the SCL-induced hematopoietic program is stable even without SCL.
In addition, Laurraine suggested that Lyl1, a factor in the same family as SCL, may maintain the hematopoietic program in the absence of SCL. Indeed, contemporary absence of Lyl1 and SCL leads to a complete absence of HSC. In the model she proposes, SCL plays a major role in the emergence of HSC before E10.5, Lyl1 maintains the SCL induced transcriptional program in HSC/progenitors until birth, and both can maintain the cells after birth.

Session info
Gereige Laurraine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA,
SPECIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCL INDUCED HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL FATE
Concurrent 42. Concurrent Session IIB: Stem Cell Fate Choice

These accounts are by Andrea Ditadi, a postdoctoral fellow studying stem cells at Hopital Necker – Enfants Malades in Paris.

Note from Niche editor This post comes as a response to my solicitation in June calling for people to submit their accounts of ISSCR 2009. I’d asked people to describe what most interested them and to disclose any conflicts of interest. I’m very grateful for these volunteers’ help making more information available.

Bookmark in Connotea

ISSCR Friday posters: cell-penetrators, differentiators, memory-storers, and more

NOTE: These write-ups of selected ISSCR posters are by Teisha Rowland, a volunteer Niche blogger and student at UC Santa Barbara.

They include the following:
Culturing MSCs in spheres may boost their differentiation capacity (Bray, Schilling, Burdon, Genever)
Small-molecule primer for ESC differentiation (Zhu, Wurdak, Wang, Schultz)
Alternative to iPSCs: sometimes fusion goes faster (Schneider, Zenke, et al)
A silky cell-penetrating protein for producing iPS cells (Park, Park, Park)

Continue reading "ISSCR Friday posters: cell-penetrators, differentiators, memory-storers, and more" »

Bookmark in Connotea

Business round-up: pluripotent products, all-star academics and headlines everywhere

Academic all-stars from the East and West Coasts of the US have united to advise a company with plans to use induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to find drugs. The company, created from the merger of Boston-based Perian and San Francisco-based iZumi, will be called iPierian and run by iZumi CEO John Walker from San Francisco.
See account in FierceBiotech and Q&A with John Walker about iZumi’s business plan (subscription to Nature Biotechnology required)

It’s not just the name that’s new:

Continue reading "Business round-up: pluripotent products, all-star academics and headlines everywhere" »

Bookmark in Connotea

ISSCR plenaries: how to repair 1) a salamander leg and 2) a human airway

NOTE: These two write-ups are by Teisha Rowland, a volunteer Niche blogger and student at UC Santa Barbara.

Limb regeneration takes nerve

Proper limb regeneration in the salamander requires the presence and function of nerves, although it is unclear why this is on a molecular level. Recent evidence implicates a newly discovered protein as having a central role in the innervation of regenerating limbs.

At ISSCR in Barcelona, Jeremy Brockes of the University College London reported that in severed salamander limbs the protein n(ewt)AG, or nAG, is key for promoting regeneration. nAG production, in turn, is linked to nerves in severed limbs.

Continue reading "ISSCR plenaries: how to repair 1) a salamander leg and 2) a human airway" »

Bookmark in Connotea

ISSCR posters: In vitro stem cell culture: are we doing enough to make the cells feel at home?

This account is by Julie Clark, a Field Application Scientist at Stemgent in San Diego.

Some five dozen abstracts published for ISSCR this year included the word “oxygen”. Each highlighted the benefits of low oxygen (0.2-10% O2) for embryonic, hematopoietic, and mesenchymal stem cell culture. Indeed a steady stream of publications describes how hypoxia inducible factors and reactive oxygen species affect stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. This makes scientists wonder what might be missing in standard in vitro culture conditions.

A discussion with Jit Hin Tan from MIT highlighted the need for continuous hypoxia: Oxygen diffuses from the media surface to the attached cell layer, creating an oxygen gradient over a period of 24 hours. Exposure to atmospheric oxygen can undo this gradient within minutes. Kristiina Rajala from the Karolinska Institute found that low oxygen tension prevented spontaneous differentiation, increased proliferation and supported self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Sandra Varum from the University of Texas described an alternate way to achieve some effects of low oxygen: antimycin A could mimic the enhanced pluripotency effect of hypoxia by inhibiting complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, thereby reducing oxidative phosphorylation.

Diverse labs have thus identified benefits of hypoxia to cell culture. But, getting these benefits comes at a price. The cost of a hypoxic-incubator closed system starts at $70,000 (about 50,000 Euros). Given the success of culture under atmospheric conditions, researchers will have to think hard about whether to replicate in vitro the low-oxygen atmosphere that cells encounter in vivo.

Note from Niche editor This post comes as a result to my solicitation in June calling for people to submit their accounts of ISSCR 2009. I’d asked people to describe what most interested them, not to write about their own or their collaborators’ work, and to disclose any conflicts of interest. I’m very grateful for these volunteers’ help making more information available.

Bookmark in Connotea

ISSCR session: Consistent differences in ES and iPS cells

This account is by Teisha Rowland, a student at UC Santa Barbara who uses hESCs and iPSCs. She runs a blog called allthingsstemcell.com

Physiological differences have not been reported between embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, but new work shows consistent gene expression differences between them. One of the biggest questions in the field has been how similar these cells really are. If there are differences, are those due to suboptimal techniques for making iPS cells, or the fact that iPS cells don’t come from an embryo?
At ISSCR in Barcelona, Kathrin Plath of UCLA reported that there are some distinct gene and miRNA expression differences between them. She compared four iPSC lines made using different methods and found that 15 genes that are consistently expressed in these lines have significantly different expression levels in ESCs. In particular, basic cellular processes are down-regulated in iPSCs compared to ESCs, while regulation of genes involved in differentiation is up-regulated. Plath suggests that this may be because the fibroblasts from which the iPSCs are made aren’t sufficiently reprogrammed. Interestingly, late-passage iPSC gene and miRNA expression more closely resemble the ESC profile than the early-passage iPSC does, in Plath’s analysis. Plath hypothesizes that this may be caused by selecting iPS cells that most resemble ESCs over many passages. Ultimately, Plath suggests that iPSCs should be thought of as a different type of pluripotent stem cell, distinct from ESCs.
See also Plath’s recent publication in Cell Stem Cell
Session and write-up info
Speaker: Kathrin Plath
Talk title: Mechanisms of Transcription Factor-Induced Reprogramming
(Thursday, Concurrent Session I, Track A)

Note from Niche editor This post comes as a response to my solicitation in June calling for people to submit their accounts of ISSCR 2009. I’d asked people to describe what most interested them and to disclose any conflicts of interest. I’m very grateful for these volunteers’ help making more information available.