Please email the editors at 'theniche at nature.com' to propose new posts.

« Stem cells, state of the union, and funding | Main | CIRM receives grant applications from industry and academia »

Bookmark in Connotea

Stem cell organizations react to Bush’s State of the Union speech

Both the International Society of Stem Cell Research and the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine have issued statements about stem cell research in the state of the union address, which praised work in reprogramming adult cells to an embryonic-like state and called for expanded funding for “ethical” research. CIRM called it “misleading.” The ISSCR said “a great deal of work remains before these methods can be used to generate stem cells suitable for safe and effective therapies.”

The ISSCR also stated that the FDA has informed fertility clinics of its policy to prevent reproductive cloning. The agency instructed institutional review boards (the committees that must approve research on human subjects) that such investigations are under its jurisdiction and will not be allowed to proceed.

Generally though, the President’s speech held nothing new. The few queries I put out to ask what was meant by “expanded funds” or “legislation that bans unethical practices” were met by the phone and equivalents of shrugs: “who knows?”

I thought a blog in Wired did a nice job of summing it up. “Both sides will applaud the expansion of reprogrammed cell research, then regroup on their side of the debate.”

Here are links to my previous posts on potential ramifications in funding and legislahtion.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4400

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'theniche at nature.com'.

please enter code