Please email the editors at 'theniche at nature.com' to propose new posts.

« As NIH gains ability to fund embryonic stem cell research, California stem cell institute poised to run out of cash | Main | Induced pluripotent stem cells display near-mythic flexibility »

Bookmark in Connotea

Rebuttal to President's Council criticism of Obama expansion of stem cell research

Last week, ten members of Bush's Council on Bioethics issued a statement criticizing President Obama's lifting of the funding ban on human embryonic stem cell research.The statement, posted by the Hastings Center, is available here. See also our previous post.

In the rebuttal also posted by the Hasting Center, Case Western bioethicist Insoo yun first commiserates with the council's hard work. Then he takes them to task, particularly for implying that Bush's policy enabled research. "To say that the Bush compromise is good enough for American stem cell science is an insult to the researchers and to our fellow citizens," Hyun writes. He also points out that embryonic stem cell research has been and continues to be essential to furthering work on induced pluripotent stem cells and that banning reproductive cloning does not logically require the banning of therapeutic cloning.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/7871

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'theniche at nature.com'.

please enter code