Archive by category | Featured

Scientific Data calls for submissions

Scientific Data calls for submissions

If so, Scientific Data can help. It’s a new type of open access journal publishing a new type of content, the Data Descriptor, designed to provide detailed descriptions of datasets: focusing on how these have been produced, by whom, and how they could be reused. We aim to make your data more discoverable, interpretable and reusable. We are calling for submissions now and launching in May next year.  Read more

Scientific Data releases two sample Data Descriptors

We recently released two sample Data Descriptors to help prospective authors interested in submitting manuscripts to Scientific Data. These samples were created to help scientists understand our unique scope and formatting requirements, and to illustrate the value of detailed descriptions of valuable datasets. Over the coming weeks we will be releasing more detailed information for authors, including Data Descriptor templates, to help prepare scientists for our call for submissions at the end of September.  Read more

Scientific Data to complement and promote public data repositories

Scientific Data to complement and promote public data repositories

Scientific Data will be a forum for publications about datasets, but will not be a repository for primary datasets. Primary data associated with Data Descriptors will be stored in one or more external data repositories. Why this distinction?  Read more

Eight questions introducing Scientific Data’s criteria for publication

Here at Scientific Data, we are busy developing guidelines for our future peer reviewers.  We believe strongly in the role that peer evaluation plays in the scientific process, and hope that Scientific Data will set a new standard for critical and constructive peer evaluation at a data-focused publication. Authors will be expected to convince referees that the data is worthy of wider use in the scientific community by supporting the technical rigor of the data collection procedures, the completeness of the data and its description, and alignment with existing community standards.  Referees will be asked to consider these points in detail, and will be free to request additional experiments when needed to support the data.  Read more