Top stories - Superfreakonomics: How did they get climate change so wrong?
-
Superfreakonomics: How did they get climate change so wrong?
added on 25 Oct 2009
In which your humble blogger makes a desperate attempt to write something original about the latest affront to reasonable discourse in the global warming crisis. There's little point in duplicating the devastating criticism that has been leveled at Superfreakonomics, the sequel to the wildly pop...
- Discussing this story:
-
Superfreakonomics: How did they get climate change so wrong?
posted to The Island of Doubt on 20 Oct 2009
In which your humble blogger makes a desperate attempt to write something original about the latest affront to reasonable discourse in the global warming crisis. There's little point in duplicating the devastating criticism that has been leveled at Superfreakonomics, the sequel to the wildly pop...
-
Bloomberg interview of Dubner and Caldeira backs up my reporting on error-riddled Superfreakonomics. Dubner is baffled that Caldeira “doesn’t believe geoengineering can work without cutting emissions.”
posted to Climate Progress on 20 Oct 2009
Caldeira, like the vast majority of climate scientists, believes cutting carbon dioxide and other greenhouse-gas emissions is our only real chance to avoid runaway climate change. “Carbon dioxide is the right villain,” Caldeira wrote on his Web site in reply. He told Joe Romm, the respected clima...
-
In pictures
-
Relevant links:
