The Sceptical Chymist

July 03, 2009

Reactions - Ian Fleming

Ian Fleming is an Emeritus Professor in the Department of Chemistry in the University of Cambridge, and worked on a range of topics in the general area of synthetic organic chemistry. He is best known as a pioneer in applying organosilicon chemistry to control the regio- and stereo-chemistry of a variety of organic reactions.

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

A short answer is: because it was transparently interesting. But it is much harder to identify why I found it so. When I was eleven or so, I had a chemistry set - an almost useless one - which I augmented with purchases from a chemist's shop over the road from my school, with a Bunsen burner, conical flasks, glass tubing, funnels etc., and with a few items my father brought home from his work as a metallurgist, like copper sulfate, and concentrated hydrochloric and sulfuric acid. The first few years of school chemistry seemed to me obvious. The chemistry master, Mr Timbrell, had written an excellent book with the School Certificate syllabus in it; I read it, understood it and remembered it. I repeated what I could of it at home, and at school sat at the back of the class playing chess while he droned on and on. The subject really came alive when we got to organic chemistry in the sixth form, taught by Stan Featherstone, who arranged for me to stay after school and carry out experiments from Mann and Saunders' textbook. I had made about 50 organic compounds by the time I left school, more than all the ones I made as an undergraduate, so I was an experienced practical chemist early on. My other subject was biology, which I fully expected to be a part of my career, but when I met biochemistry at Cambridge I soon realised that the only part I found interesting was metabolic pathways - the chemistry. At the same time, in my second year, we met organic reaction mechanisms, first from Peter Sykes and then more compellingly from Malcolm Clark, and molecular orbital theory from Christopher Longuet-Higgins. The subject began to have a satisfying intellectual structure, and I was hooked. From then on, and especially in the next four or five years, I was able to order all my organic chemical knowledge into a coherent framework, to which I've been adding all the time. So a second short answer is: Stan Featherstone, Malcolm Clark and Christopher Longuet-Higgins.

2. If you weren't a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be - and why?

Realistically, of course, I would have been something close to a chemist: a biochemist or even maybe a doctor, but that is not interesting. Moving away from science, and choosing something from within my competence, I might have liked to be a photojournalist, because you get to see extraordinary things and people. I might equally have answered a film director, if I were allowed to interpret the words "could do" in the question to mean that I had magically been given the talent.

3. What are you working on now, and where do you hope it will lead?

I am rewriting my textbooks - I've finished and published the sixth edition of the Spectroscopic Methods book that Dudley Williams and I wrote, and am now putting the finishing touches to two versions of a book to replace my Frontier Orbitals book, which is now an astonishing 33 years old. I have a 300-page "student" edition at the same level as the Frontier Orbitals book, and a 550-page "library" version, with all the references and much more material, for those who want more. As before, it treats the subject without mathematics for the benefit of all those organic chemists like me who have little mathematical aptitude but want to understand the subject in a physical way. The new versions will be called Molecular Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions, with less emphasis on the Frontier Orbitals. My next task will probably be to look again at an even older book of mine: Selected Organic Syntheses.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with - and why?

Samuel Johnson was arguably the wisest man ever, and good company. But a great many other names come to mind: Queen Elizabeth I, Henry James, Virginia Woolf, Orson Welles, Shakespeare, Billy Wilder? What a dinner party.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab - and what was it?

Some of my later co-workers may remember my showing them how to get crystals - a lost art it seems, but I don't think that counts as an experiment. The last preparation I remember was the preliminary work for the indole syntheses that Mike Woolias developed, when I prepared the way for him, by establishing that the reaction worked. It involved an amino group displacing an aryl halide, long before Buchwald and Hartwig, and without any transition metals being necessary. I remember leaving a reflux going to open an epoxide with benzylamine in ethanol, while I went to the Oxford Synthesis Meeting in July 1973, and coming back to find that not only had the epoxide been opened but the intramolecular displacement of the ortho bromide had also taken place.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one music album would you take with you?

It's always difficult to restrict oneself to one. It would have to be big. War and Peace, perhaps, or is one allowed the whole of Shakespeare? For music, it would have to be the late Beethoven quartets.

7. Which chemist would you like to see interviewed on Reactions - and why?

David Evans of Harvard, because he is inspirationally thoughtful in teaching and research.

Lindau09: Twitter round-up #4

Here are the highlights from yesterday's tweets from the 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

7.43am Final day of lectures here in Lindau (although not the final day of the meeting), and this morning will be a GFP extravaganza!

8.02am Shimomura is first up - telling us about the chemistry of bioluminescence

8.19am Interesting fact of the day from Shimomura who tells us that krill is the most abundant animal on the earth

8.31am Chalfie - I'm the accidental Laureate that got into the middle of this - he works on sensory mechanotransduction

8.33am Chalfie has spent a lot of his career 'tickling worms' - C. elegans that is - to find out how they respond to touch

9.08am Students and postdocs are the real innovators in science according to Chalfie

9.13am Final lecture of the 1st session is given by Roger Tsien - who will tell us about some of the mistakes he made & where he got lucky

9.48am Tsien - 'normally there is nothing green inside a mouse'!

9.51am Tsien has yet to run a gel or do a PCR reaction in his life - if he had to hire himself, he wouldn't do it!!

10.01am Schrock takes the stage - co-recipient of the 2005 chem prize (http://bit.ly/axqQt) - apologises for not being at the whole meeting

10.34am Schrock shows some 14 electron Mo catalysts that have 4 different groups on the metal centre - chiral metal catalysts on the way?

10.42am Take home message from Schrock - air-sensitive catalysts are good (not bad) if they can do something other catalysts can't

10.46am Final formal lecture of Lindau 09 given by Werner Arber, Laureate in Physiology or Medicine from 1978 (http://bit.ly/g1V74)

10.52am Arber is using a computer slideshow for his talk on 'Molecular Darwinism' - but all the slides are drawn by hand!

July 02, 2009

Lindau09: Island hopping

Tomorrow the Lindau Meeting shifts to another island in Lake Constance. Early in the morning, delegates will climb aboard a boat and be ferried across the lake to the island of Mainau - a trip taking more than a couple of hours. Here we will be treated to a panel discussion about 'Global Warming and Sustainability' with quite a distinguished line-up. As well as Laureates Molina and Schrock, the panel also includes Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - which won the Peace Prize in 2007. Other participants include the author Bjorn Lomborg, and Professors William Moomaw and Thomas Stocker.

Because it is unlikely I'll have good web access tomorrow, I figured I should briefly post about Thursday's activities before I go. The first session of lectures amounted to a green fluorescent protein (GFP) extravaganza, with talks from Shimomura, Chalfie and Tsien (last year's recipients of the chemistry prize). We were treated to some very colourful slides, including a green bunny and the incredible hulk! It was nice to hear both Chalfie and Tsien talk about Doug Prasher's contribution to the area - the 'missing' Laureate in GFP research.

Both Chalfie and Tsien had stories to tell about getting their seminal papers published. Editors at a certain high-profile journal objected to Chalfie using the word 'new' in the title of his paper, saying that all work they published was new! Perhaps more amusing, however, was when someone from the art department got in touch with Chalfie about his cover image - they really liked the picture, but there was one colour they didn't really like to use on the cover, so could they get rid of the green...?! 'No', said Chalfie.

Tsien's story about publishing the crystal structure of GFP was one of referee trouble (at the same journal Chalfie struggled with). The first referee said that it was a competent crystal structure, but the protein was not very interesting! The second referee said it was all well and good but the paper didn't answer the most important question about GFP - it's biological role in the jellyfish! The manuscript was rejected and when Tsien appealed, the editor sent it to a third referee. Many months passed, however, and the third referee never replied. Then, on the internet, Tsien found a comment from someone saying that they had solved the crystal structure of GFP and it was coming out the following month in a different journal - Tsien forwarded this to the editor and the paper was accepted the next day! Moral of the story - be careful what you say on the internet...

Both Chalfie and Tsien had some great quotes - I include a few below (I can't guarantee that I have the wording exactly correct, but the meaning remains unaltered):

Chalfie:

It's very hard to tell if an animal is touch-sensitive if it is dead!
I'm the accidental Laureate that got into the middle of this.
Students and postdocs are the real innovators in science.

Tsien:

Biology has the most interesting grand questions in all of science currently doable by individuals.
I was no smarter the day after I received the Nobel prize than the day before, but it made me a lot more famous!
Prizes are ultimately a matter of luck, so avoid being motivated or impressed by them.

After the coffee break, the final two lectures at this Lindau Meeting were delivered by Richard Schrock (Chemistry 2005) and Werner Arber (Physiology or Medicine 1978). Schrock gave us a tour through his Mo and W metathesis catalysts, showing some recent work on being able to make Z-olefins, rather than the more thermodynamically stable E isomers. He was also eager to point out that although his catalysts are air and water sensitive (in contrast to the Ru catalysts of Grubbs and others), this does not matter if (i) you're making a billion-dollar drug or (ii) there is no other way of doing the same reaction. Anyone out there in pharma-land wish to comment on part (i)?

Finally, Countess Bernadotte wrapped up this part of the meeting, thanking the Laureates, the young researchers, the organisers and even the media - very nice to get a mention! We then headed off with Schrock to film with two students, although extracting a Nobel Laureate from adoring fans who want photos and autographs is not an easy task... but eventually we made it to the shoot location in a nearby hotel. Once that was finished, my headache finally got the better of me and I headed out of the heat and back to where I am staying - and now because it's a really early start tomorrow (and I'm not a big fan of those), I'm off to bed...

Stuart


Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)


PS: There are lots of other people blogging from the meeting - check out some of these posts and have a poke around at each place for other Lindau entries here, here, here, here and here (apologies to those posts/bloggers I may have missed - feel free to leave links in the comments to this post).

Lindau09: Twitter round-up #3

Here are the highlights from yesterday's tweets from the 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

Wednesday 01 July

8.02am Day 3 begins here in Lindau and first up is Rudy Marcus (http://bit.ly/3tUJT) - sole recipient of the chemistry Nobel Prize in 1992

8.38am Next speaker is Kurt Wüthrich (http://bit.ly/dBaqV) who won a half-share of the 2002 chemistry prize

8.43am Wüthrich uses his belt to represent the human genome... 1.8 m of DNA - although he says his belt is not quite that large (yet)

9.16am The final talk before the coffee break is Sir Harry Kroto (http://bit.ly/Kd08W) speaking about science, society and sustainability

9.22am Kroto just explained chemistry and life in 30 seconds (I think he may have skimmed over a few important bits)

9.40am Kroto - if no-one finds a use for C60 soon, I may have to give the prize back...!

10.23am Coffee break over and Robert Huber - Laureate in '88 (http://bit.ly/2lwtV5) - is speaking about the destruction of molecules

11.13am Coming to the stage now is Walter Kohn - co-recipient of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1998 (http://bit.ly/dvcaL) with Pople

11.20am Kohn is showing us a film he made called 'The Power of the Sun' - narrated by, if I am not mistaken, John Cleese!

11.44am Kohn would not be surprised if our two major forms of energy are solar and wind after the transition from fossil fuels

11.51am Final speaker today is Peter Agre - Laureate in Chemistry in 2003 (http://bit.ly/J6Hxl) on canoeing in the arctic

12.02pm Agre points out that one of his companions on his Arctic trips deserves a Nobel Prize for baking bread using camp fire & stones!

You can read Stu's full take on yesterday's proceedings in his post Lindau09: And now for something completely different.

Lindau09: And now for something completely different

Wednesday morning at the Lindau meeting saw a full slate of talks from half-a-dozen Chemistry Laureates: Marcus (1992), Wüthrich (2002), Kroto (1996), Huber (1988), Kohn (1998), Agre (2003) - and some of the highlights are covered below...

Marcus joked that he was going to speak for a couple of hours, but finished exactly on time after 35 minutes, giving us a tour of catalysis in many different forms, such as the 'on-water' work by Sharpless through to single-molecule enzyme catalysis. The next lecture was from Wüthrich, who started off by telling us that 'NMR' does not stand for 'no meaningful results' and then proceeded to take off his belt - and fortunately he stopped there! He then went on to use his belt to illustrate the human genome.

The final talk of the first session was from Kroto, who spoke on themes of science, society and sustainability. His lecture was a barrage on the senses (albeit a very entertaining one), with slides popping up at a high rate of knots, with occasional sound effects to boot. We were shown examples of artwork that Kroto had produced, including stamps, and even a new design for the flag of Japan. He then moved on to topics such as creationism and religion in general, Web 2.0 opportunities for science and scientific education, and the fact that he may have to give his prize back if no one finds a use for C60 in the near future! Kroto left the stage to the longest and loudest applause of the meeting so far.

After the coffee break, Huber was the first speaker, although the computer on which the presentations were loaded would not play ball. Problems finally solved, he went on to tell us about protein degradation. Kohn was next up and apart from a brief intro and wrap up, his 'lecture' consisted of showing a film he had made, called 'The power of the sun' - narrated by John Cleese of Monty Python fame. No ex-parrots in sight unfortunately! The final talk of the day was given by Agre, who told us about his canoeing trips in the arctic and sub-arctic. Although he tied his talk to environmental themes and climate issues, such as the changing migration paths of caribou and the impact on native hunters, it was hard not to think that we were just seeing his holiday snaps (very pretty ones, nonetheless!).

Lectures over for the day, I went to help out the film crew once more. The first shoot was a conversation between one of the young researchers (Tyler) and Ernst. As the storm clouds gathered in the distance and the thunder got louder, lightning crackled across the sky and the heavens opened - making filming impossible. With lots of camera equipment and a Nobel Laureate in tow, we tried to take the most direct (and driest) route back inside the conference venue. Our way was barred by the conference stewards, who probably assumed we wanted to film the afternoon discussions (which is not allowed - in fact, no press are allowed in those sessions at all) - whereas all we wanted to do was get inside to then go and find a new location. Tyler came to the rescue — his German being better than any of ours — and finally persuaded the stewards to let us in... he pointed out that we had a Laureate with us, who probably shouldn't get soaked in a thunderstorm. So, there you have it, getting the call from Stockholm can open doors for you!

Two shoots later, with Ciechanover and Tsien, it was time to wind down for the day and plan our activities for Thursday - just one shoot I need to be at today, so may have a little free time later this afternoon to explore Lindau. There may not be a post tomorrow, as we're off to the island of Mainau and away from the wireless access here in the Inselhalle, but they'll be a couple of more Lindau posts at some point.

Stuart


Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)

July 01, 2009

Lindau09: Reflections on day 2

Tuesday morning at Lindau saw three talks from Laureates - Aaron Ciechanover (Chemistry 2004), Mario Molina (Chemistry 1995), and Erwin Neher (Physiology or Medicine 1991). Unfortunately I was called away just at the start of the first talk to shuttle our van around Lindau and only made it back half-way through Molina's talk. Jason - one of my colleagues here - had it even worse, however, as he headed over to Zurich (almost a 300-km round trip!) to pick up essential equipment for the film crew.

After the coffee break, we were treated to the first of two panel discussions here at the meeting - this one was about the role and future of chemistry for renewable energy. Sitting on the panel were Laureates Ertl, Grubbs, Kohn, Kroto, Marcus, Molina and Rowland - quite a line-up! The moderator framed various problems at the opening of the discussion, in particular (i) the fact that fossil fuels will not last forever, (ii) anthropogenic climate change as a consequence of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, and (iii) security problems with nuclear energy technologies. Each Laureate was invited to respond in an opening statement and some snippets are included below.

Ertl reminded us that we cannot create (nor destroy) energy and that our problems simply boil down to how we can harness the power of the sun to produce useful energy that can be stored in a practical fashion - he suggested that silicon photovoltaics are potentially a promising way forward. Grubbs reminded us that he was the only organic chemist on the panel (the first time I've heard him describe himself as an organic chemist!) and that materials science is a crucial and enabling technology for renewable energies, in terms of making energy storage and transport more efficient. Kohn summed up the situation by telling us that tough problems must be tackled by viewing them from many different perspectives.

Next was Kroto, who said that we need to recognise the scale of the problem - telling us that it takes a million years to produce the quantity of fossil fuels we currently consume each year. Water splitting is what we should focus on in his opinion - and recounted someone telling him that if 'stupid' trees can do it, then we should be able to do it too! The problem is that trees really aren't that stupid after all - nature has had a long time to figure out photosynthesis. Sir Harry went on to criticise how science is funded, and pointed out that breakthroughs often come from blue-sky research and that governments and funding agencies should continue to fund such work.

Marcus was next and brought up the point that not only is solar energy conversion an important societal challenge, but is also a very interesting and stimulating intellectual challenge. Large numbers of researchers and good collaborations are required - and he suggested that a mini Manhattan Project is in order (obviously with a very different goal, but using the same principle of bringing together leading scientists and engineers from around the world to tackle a pressing problem).

Molina and Rowland rounded out the opening statements, with Molina suggesting that society needs to double or triple its investment in renewable energy - and although it may look self-serving for a scientist working in this area to say this, it is wholly justified. Finally Rowland lamented the fact that he had to say something original after following six other Laureates! Nevertheless, he did, saying that we should focus on getting rid of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and also look at other nuclear fusion approaches, although he was less optimistic about these.

Finally, the moderators presented questions to the Laureates that had been prepared by the students - and much discussion ensued about the best way to tackle the energy problems we face as scientists and as a society.

That concluded the open scientific activities for the day and then I went off to my other career here, that of a helping hand with the film crew. First off we filmed a couple of the young researchers chatting with Peter Agre and then headed off to one of the hotels to film a discussion between Molina, Rowland and three students moderated by Olive from the Climate Feedback blog.

After that, there was another production meeting to discuss the filming schedule for today and that will kick into high gear after lunch - and stories will follow tomorrow...

Stuart


Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Lindau09: Twitter round-up #2

Here are the highlights from yesterday's tweets from the 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

Tuesday 30 June

8.50am And speaking now is Mario Molina (http://bit.ly/qA6Zf) - the third of the 'ozone hole' Laureates to speak at the meeting

8.57am Molina - no silver bullet for solving climate problems, need to implement a number of different measures to tackle the problem

9.16am Next 'guest' Laureate is Erwin Neher (http://bit.ly/IvcoH), who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology & Medicine, not chemistry! Neher is going to tell us about how chemistry helps neuroscience

10.10am Incredible Laureate line-up for panel discussion: Ertl, Grubbs, Kohn, Kroto, Marcus, Molina, Rowland - let's see where this goes...

10.21am Ertl reminds us that we cannot create energy, just convert it from one form to another (pesky laws of thermodynamics!)

10.26am Grubbs points out he's the only organic chemist on the panel - and says that new materials are vital for energy storage/transport

10.42am Kroto reminds us that some of the most important breakthroughs come from blue-sky research and so we must continue to fund it! Met with applause from the audience.

10.52am Molina says that society must double or triple its investment if we are to make headway in tackling the energy problem

11.01am Rowland suggests we should concentrate on the problem of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere

11.05am Question - can we combine chemical & biological systems to address energy problems? Maybe, but it seems nature has a big head start

11.12am Kroto - does the amount of money poured into the Manhattan project compare with the funding of nuclear fusion projects?

11.16am Ertl - still lots of open questions in nuclear fusion, but that's no reason not to continue...

11.18am What do you say to people who don't believe in climate change? Listen to Prof. Molina says Ertl!!

June 30, 2009

Lindau09: Art meets science

On day 1 of the Lindau Meeting, art and science collided in more than one way... here's what I got up to.

First port of call was the Inselhalle on the island of Lindau (which is connected to the mainland by road and rail). The island is a pleasant 20-30 minute walk from our hotels on the mainland, or just a few minutes drive in the space-age VW van we have been kindly given for the duration of the meeting. It has a few thousand miles on the clock but has a genuine new car smell - so much so, I though it was brand new.

Anyway the morning began in a packed lecture hall and the first Laureate to speak was the 2007 Nobel Prize recipient, Gerhard Ertl. So, the conference kicked off with some hardcore catalysis - the kind that takes place on solid surfaces. We were treated to some pretty patterns associated with complex reactions - such as the BZ reaction.

Art featured much more heavily in the second lecture of the day, which was delivered by the 1991 awardee, Richard Ernst. He told us that there is much beyond traditional science, such as arts and humanities and that we should have 'passions' outside of science to make us more complete individuals. His lecture ranged from the cultural history of central Asia - including, in particular, Tibetan art, of which he is a collector - to science education for monks and nuns in south India: 'Science meets Dharma'. Ernst talked us through some fascinating pieces of art - and then moved on to art restoration and chemical techniques for pigment analysis, nicely weaving together his interests in art and science.

The first session of the day was rounded out by Ryoji Noyori whose theme was very much that chemistry is the key to our future. The moral to his story was that while nature gives us many wonderful molecules, the synthetic chemist can make so many more, and as we develop newer and better methodology, we can make them selectively and efficiently. He ended by saying that education is key and that the young researchers at the meeting are crucial for our (chemical) future.

After the coffee break, the first two speakers were Sherwood Rowland and Paul Crutzen - co-recipients of the 1995 Nobel Prize (along with Mario Molina). If you ever had any doubts about anthropogenic climate change, then you need to listen to these eminent scientists speak. The first day was then rounded out by Hartmut Michel - who received the Nobel Prize in 1988 - telling us about cytochrome c oxidase.

That was it for lectures, but then in the afternoon I turned runner/boom operator for the film crew shooting the Nature videos. I went from Laureate chauffer - driving SIr Harry Kroto and his wife to the location of the filming - to 'microphone stand' - which my colleague Sam assures me is the technical term for a boom operator... - I think he might be winding me up...

Anyway, after a successful shoot, Prof. Kroto and his wife had a much smoother ride back to their hotel when someone else drove the VW van, and then finally the team got together for some well-deserved tex-mex as the sun slowly set. Discussions about filming for today ensued, and then we made our way back to our hotels to recharge for today - which you can find out about tomorrow! More then...

For other NPG blogging, check out the Climate Feedback blog and Olive's post about the renewable energy panel discussion earlier today.

Stuart


Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Lindau09: Twitter round-up #1

For those of you who don't follow our Twitter feed, I'm going to summarise Stu's output from the 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting on a daily basis

Mon 29 June

8.03am And here we go with the scientific part of the meeting after the opening ceremony yesterday - first up is Ertl http://bit.ly/txc5R

8.23am Ertl compares the reaction between carbon monoxide and oxygen to the 'reaction' between hares and lynxes and the fur trade - clever!

8.34am Ertl talks about spiral patterns in reactions & complexity - such as in the BZ reaction; see here for more info http://bit.ly/1nDFsB

8.35am And now it's Richard Ernst (http://bit.ly/RFJ34) who will talk about passions and activities beyond science

9.03am Ernst says that 'NMR is useless' for pigment analysis - use Raman spectroscopy instead; he does this at home!

9.13am Third lecture of the morning is from Ryoji Noyori (http://bit.ly/it8MF) talking about chemistry as the key to our future

9.16am Noyori: "close involvement with society is the destiny of science"

10.19am Second session of the morning begins with Sherwood Rowland (http://bit.ly/qA6Zf) talking about green house gases & climate change

10.31am What does it take for a molecule to be a greenhouse gas? - well, one requirement is a minimum of 3 atoms (for IR absorption)

10.48am Now on stage is Paul Crutzen (http://bit.ly/qA6Zf), who says that Rowland is a hard act to follow, but that he has better slides!

11.48am Final speaker of the open scientific sessions today is Hartmut Michel (http://bit.ly/2lwtV5) - talking about cytochrome c oxidase

11.56am So, open talks on day 1 are over. The afternoon will see closed-session discussions between the young researchers & Laureates

If you want to ask Stuart questions as he tweets, get on Twitter and direct your queries @NatureChemistry!

June 29, 2009

Lindau09: Setting the scene

So, the NPG team and film crew arrived on Saturday afternoon in Germany and after checking in to our hotels on the mainland, we made our way over to the island of Lindau to meet some prospective students for the series of videos that we are producing. Much discussion ensued over dinner later in the evening and the plan for the films started to crystallise - calls were made and appointments set.

Sunday morning began with some filming of some of the students chosen to speak with the Laureates in the films. This involved finding locations on the scenic island of Lindau where there was enough sun, but not too much - and as little background noise as possible. You really don't notice how noisy 'background noise' can be until you need to film! Cobbled streets and roller-suitcases make for quite a din!

Sunday afternoon then saw the opening ceremony at Lindau, which began with a very eloquent and moving address to the assembled delegates from Countess Bettina Bernadotte, President of the Council for the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings. Two new members were admitted to the Honorary Senate of the Foundation Lindau Nobelprizewinners Meetings at Lake Constance - José Barroso, President of the EU-Commission and Kapil Sibal, Indian Minister for Human Resource Development.

The ceremony drew to a close after a discussion on the stage with five of the young researchers who are attending the meeting, during which they described what is required to succeed in science - with answers ranging from good collaborations, support, ambition, and perhaps even a little bit of luck.

We've now just had the first scientific session, with talks from Ertl, Ernst and Noyori - I'll gather my thoughts and then tell you all about it a little later, but now the second session is moments away. For live updates, you can follow on Twitter!

Stuart


Stuart Cantrill (Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2