« Carry On Chemistry | Main | Ask an expert »

I am the Lorax. I speak for the trees...


While flipping through yesterday's issue of Nature, I came across the special report on toxicology/toxicologists in the Naturejobs section... After struggling to get that infernal Britney Spears song out of my head, I read through the article, which really made toxicology sound like an interesting career...

Ricki Lewis wrote that a "career in toxicology might take a scientist to a contaminated well, a crime scene, a courtroom, an analytical chemistry lab or a political hearing" and "it isn't uncommon for a seasoned scientist to have spent time in academia, industry and government, and finish with private consulting." Considering how successful shows like CSI and Numb3rs are, I'm a bit surprised that no one's produced a prime-time TV drama starring toxicologists (I can see it now - EPA: Risk Assessment Unit...)


There's also a nice News & Views article by Robert Crabtree on a recent Science paper from the Goldman and Brookhart laboratories - in the presence of an iridium catalyst and a Schrock metathesis catalyst, the authors reported that a tandem alkane dehydrogenation/olefin metathesis reaction could be used to elongate inert hydrocarbon chains (technically, it's a tandem alkane dehydrogenation/olefin metathesis/alkane hydrogenation reaction, but that's a bit of a mouthful...)

The authors hope that this system could be used "turn coal, leftover oil refinery products or even plants into diesel fuel and other functional hydrocarbons." But Professor Brookhart acknowledged that "considerable improvements in the catalyst systems are required before they become practical."

Joshua


Joshua Finkelstein (Associate Editor, Nature)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/506

Comments

The video for "Toxic" was great. I think it was her last local maximum on the hotness scale.

About tv-series, great idea "Toxicologists," but what about Medical Investigation? :)

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thescepticalchymist at boston dot nature dot com '.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Out of 1046 total comments,
the most recent were:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2