« Nano pants! | Main | Tubulin is red, violets are blue, isofagamine is sweet, and so are you! »

Heard that talk about short'nin' bread?

I don't eat bread very often, so I have started to store it in the fridge to prevent little beasties from growing on it. In the process of restocking my fridge after being away for the holidays, I discovered that my current loaf of bread has gotten distinctly harder, which led me to ask the question: 'why, oh why, would my lovely bread go stale like that?' The answer, of course, is all about chemistry. As I learned in 'The Science of Cooking,' the starch granules that are present in flour (particularly those consisting of amylose) are crystallized. When the bread bakes, the crystals melt, and then are not able to form again quickly when the bread cools. But over time, the crystals grow, resulting in a tan brick where you used to have some yummy bagels. Two funny things which may undermine my whole fridge-strategy for storing bread are that this process is catalyzed by water and the rate of starch crystallization is fastest at 4 °C! Who knew?!?

On the other hand, it's entirely possible that both processes (both going stale and growing other life forms) are so drastically affected by preservatives that it may be a moot discussion these days, but that's a topic for another time...

Catherine (associate editor, Nature Chemical Biology)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1728

Comments

Nature does not care, we do. Polymers survive weathering given antioxidants, UV absorbers, and surface-blooming ozone blocks. Bread products remain yummy over extended periods given food chemists.

Why would anybody (except consumers) want bread to persist? "Natural and organic" are inferior goods that rapidly spoil, sold at high prices. Technology knows what it is doing. Enviro-whiners and Luddites also know what technology does, and despise it. This is exploitable for unearned profits, stale bread to the H*Y*D*R*O*G*E*N economy.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thescepticalchymist at boston dot nature dot com '.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Out of 805 total comments,
the most recent were:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2