« ACS: Lost in space | Main | ACS: Listen up kids, it could happen to you »

ACS: Rage for the machine

Yesterday was a good day for talks, and first up on my talk schedule was the symposium in honour of Ben Feringa, who has been awarded the James Flack Norris Award in Physical Organic Chemistry. Ben wrote the review article on molecular machines that we published in the first issue of Nature Nanotechnology (you can see it here – free access) and it’s always a pleasure to see him talk.

Colin Nuckolls got the session off to a great start with his talk about molecular electronics, where he puts molecules between two carbon nanotube electrodes and then does all sorts of fancy stuff with them... pH switches, metal-ion gating, photoswitching, biosensing... Next up was Takuzo Aida, who wins the award for snazziest (that is a word, right?) PowerPoint so far – treating us to movie after movie describing his light-driven molecular machines.

Dennis Dougherty was next, reminding us that nature has been making molecular machines for a lot longer than we have – and so is an awful lot better at it that us. Josh did a write-up of this talk in an earlier post (see here), but I wanted to comment on the fantastic delivery, especially the dead-pan definition of what a structure-function relationship is... and then pointing out that we would have probably figured it out eventually! Recalling all the debate (in the blogosphere at least) about last year’s chemistry Nobel prize, it was interesting to hear Dougherty say that, “crystallography is physics”.

And then, Ben rounded out the session with his talk about molecular machines and motors. I also caught up with him later at the RSC reception and, with a little arm-twisting, he has agreed to do a ‘Reactions’ piece for the blog (well, he can’t say ‘no’ now, can he?).

Stuart


Stuart Cantrill (Associate Editor, Nature Nanotechnology)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2168

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thescepticalchymist at boston dot nature dot com '.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Out of 826 total comments,
the most recent were:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2