« Podcast killed the radio star | Main | Reactions - Stuart Rowan »

Fireworks come alive! ALIVE!!!

Like many in the US, I spent yesterday evening watching an impressive display of fireworks to celebrate our independence day. Even though I'm a chemist, I've spent surprisingly little time thinking about how fireworks are made, or how all those swirly patterns are produced (although this site was really interesting). It got me thinking, though; how and when do people decide that they want to devote their life to making fireworks? Are they analytical chemists who want to do something more with the sodium D-line than measure it? Are they inorganic chemists who get tired of just making compounds and then storing them in the freezer? Were they encouraged by their high school guidance counselor to explore their passion for exploding things? (we had a similar conversation in the office about the thought process involved in becoming a professional eater like the folks who competed yesterday in the Coney Island hot dog eating competition...)

In recent years, my favorite fireworks have been the ones that look like Saturn - you know, the big globes with the rings around them (although I doubt Saturn is as brightly colored). My least favorite fireworks, until last night, were the 'maroon' shells - the ones that just explode as a dot of light but with an incredible noise. However, as much as I value my hearing, those annoying fireworks have been supplanted by a new and creepy design. I'm not sure of the name, but the explosion results in a bunch of white starry things, which then veer off in directions that make no sense according to the original trajectory. It made me think I was looking at either a) UFOs or b) (and more disturbingly) a bacterial swarm assay. Yuck. I apologize to the person who must have spent 5 years developing these, but I am not a fan.

In any case, now that we have fireworks that look like E. coli, we need to get some chemistry into the patterns (aside from the fact that the whole thing is based on chemistry, obviously...). What about a giant TLC plate where spots develop? Or a beaker-shaped outline of lights?

What would your fireworks look like if you were a fireworks-ician (fireworks-alist? fireworks-ist?)

Catherine (associate editor, Nature Chemical Biology)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2980

Comments

My TLC plates glow enough already--I don't need to make them explode as well... Then again, I'm not picky when it comes to brightly colored things.

> What would your fireworks look like if you were a fireworks-ician (fireworks-alist? fireworks-ist?)

"pyrotechnician" :D

This year we had some that made smiley faces in the air. That was quite cool.

We're lucky enough that we have a great view from our balcony, so we invite family and friends over. There are great chemistry lessons in fireworks, so I usually do a chemistry demo for the kids (of all ages) as well.

Ah, of course - pyrotechnicians. That's what I get for blogging when I've stayed up late watching those fireworks-icians at work! ;)

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thescepticalchymist at boston dot nature dot com '.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Out of 805 total comments,
the most recent were:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2