« Journal journeys: Day 14, Driven to distraction | Main | Reactions - Stuart James »

Chemiotics: Introduction and allegro

[Editor’s note – a new guest contributor, Retread, has joined the team, and should be familiar to some of our readers...]

Feb 13, 2008

"Everything in Chemistry turns blue or explodes". Only a philosophy major in full hubristic cry could say that to his pre-med chemistry-major ex-roommate. There was some reality to it as the teacher of Chem 101, Dr Hubert N. Alyea, was really a small boy trapped in a professor suit, and usually blew something up in every lecture. Chemistry is still the Rodney Dangerfield of the sciences, important when the demand for taxol for breast cancer threatened to destroy every yew tree in sight, yet largely ignored by its progeny, biochemistry and molecular biology and the press.

Probably every nascent chemist suffers through things like this, but I got more than most, rooming with two philosophy majors as an undergraduate (one of whom was later a Rhodes). It definitely gives you both a thick skin and a more abstract cast of mind.

For who I am and my background go to ChemBark, scroll down the Categories section until you get to Rip Van Winkle open it up and start reading. This where I would have stayed, happily posting now and then and reading and responding to comments. However Paul has other fish to fry (probably his thesis) and ChemBark has developed a definite funereal cast in the 3 months since Paul's last post. Anyway, Paul got me started and gave me a forum, encouragement and advice, so I owe him at least a good dinner. Thanks Paul.

If contact with budding philosophers didn't make me somewhat reflective, then following the development of molecular biology from '62 to the present with the eye and background of a Woodward grad student and medical practice as a neurologist from '67 to '00 certainly was enough to do so. This is why future posts will be on things like:

1. Is there really such a thing as causality in cellular biochemistry and physiology?

2. Is organic chemistry easy or hard?
2a. If it's hard, is math harder?

3. Are there important chemical experiments which we can't do because the earth isn't big enough?

4. Is there really such a thing as control in chemical systems with feedback on every component (including the elements providing the feedback)?

5. Does the complexity of cellular chemistry and biochemistry raise questions about the adequacy of chance to bring it about?

That's for the future. The next post (probably a very long one because of the background required) will be on a recent spectacular paper which, if replicated and generally applicable, will revolutionize the way we think of the control of gene transcription. Thomas Kuhn where are you when we need you?

Stay tuned

Retread

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4479

Comments

Great post...there is always great tension between the humanities and the sciences!

In the context of no. 2 there, I remember when I was in college and an organic chemist uncle saw a textbook on my table and remarked, "Organic chemistry...just like math, only easier"

To some extent I agreed with him and thought it was an accurate assessment.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thescepticalchymist at boston dot nature dot com '.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2