« Journal journeys: Day 54, Housekeeping | Main | Reactions - Phil Gale »

Beating nature to save the planet

It's been a while since I blogged here - apologies. I haven't been neglecting chemistry though - far from it. I've been ferreting away on a feature article, just out in Nature this week.

It's all about trying to find ways to copy the processes in photosynthesis to split water and produce a fuel - hydrogen. Yes yes, I know it is already possible to split water, but the latests efforts have a longer-term goal of finding sustainable, friendly materials to do the job. And it is a lot harder than it might sound.

Nature uses catalysts to drive complex multielectron processes, but exactly what the molecular nature of these catalysts are isn't known. So trying to directly copy them is challenging. And finding a completely different system that works as well, nay, better, is harder still.

A recent paper in Angewandte Chemie has a catalyst that can perform half the job, and impressive it is too, working as it does at room temperature and with reasonable turnovers. But still, it is a tetra ruthenium compound. Not likely to come in as an economic competitor to fossil fuels, unfortunately.

There will be a session at the ACS, organised by UCLA graduate students, called NanoPOWER that will likely address many of the challenges remaining for power, and fuel production. I'm hoping to be there to see what alternatives chemists can offer.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4823

Comments

May be I'm getting something wrong here but if the ruthenium complex is supposed to work as a catalyst why is the cost for it considered as a show stopper? My understanding of a catalyst is that it is not destroyed in the process but can be reused.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thescepticalchymist at boston dot nature dot com '.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Out of 754 total comments,
the most recent were:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2