« IUPAC '09: Mapping methanol in space | Main | IUPAC '09: Nanofun and marvellous MOFs »

IUPAC '09: Strontium sticks

On my way up to Glasgow from London I did a spot of sailing. On the trip from Fleetwood, Lancashire, to Whitehaven, Cumbria, for a long time we could see the nuclear fuel plant Sellafield. It spans a vast area of the Cumbrian coast line.

So it was with interest that I spotted a poster by phd student Sarah Wallace from Leeds University in the UK.

She has been looking at how strontium, a waste prduct from Sellafield, wil move in the sediment near the plant, and if it might make it into the groundwater.

The contaminant plumes from the plant tend to have a high pH, and what Wallace had found so far is that in these conditions strontium-90 likes to stick to sediment. This could actually be good news for Sellafield because the half life of strontium90 is such that as long as it sticks to the ground it will have decayed within 300 years or so.

Strontium is potentially nasty because it's in the same chemical group as calcium, a major bone component. So if strontium gets into the water and into the body, it can compete with calcium in the bones and cause diseases such as leukemia.

Wallaces work involved a fake contaminated bit of land - taking normal soil and untouched groundwater from the area and spiking it. In future she hopes to see what the longer term effects of strontium-90 are.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8947

Comments

Pls, compare the hypothetical Sr concentration in human bones from Sellafield with 5 to 10 thousand K40 decays per second in average human body. K40 is also a beta emitter.
Perhaps noting that the nuclear power plant did some good - produced electricity - would have been worth mentioning.
R.H.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thescepticalchymist at boston dot nature dot com '.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Out of 1046 total comments,
the most recent were:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2