« Stamen talk | Main | WikiProteins - a more critical look »

WikiProteins - are a million minds listening?

A couple of days ago Barend Mons and colleagues published an article in Genome Biology about WikiProteins - a new way of asking a "million minds to annotate a million [biomedical] concepts". On the face of it, it seems like an fine idea: combine text mining and other database trawling (Medline, GO, UniProt and others), distill some concept maps from that (Knowlets, they call them) and invite scientists to chip in via a wiki.

The Genome Biology article has a stellar author list, with big names in scientific databases and wikis. That said, they're taking on a tricky task in getting scientists to contribute to a scientific wiki. Of course scientists do contribute to Wikipedia heartily, but I don't know of any specialized wikis (or Professional wikis, to slip into WikiProtein's terminology) that are burning rubber on the information highways.

WikiProteins is a product of KnewCo, and it's not clear what their business model is. You'd have to guess that some level of paid-for services are planned. I could imagine that working -- if the user interface is easy enough for non-informaticians, and the Knowlets prove genuinely useful, people might pay to get automatic Knowlet Updates or to see reviews from commissioned experts. Maybe I'm wrong and Knewco has other plans. Let's hope they stay around long enough for us to find out.

Now, anybody who has read this far down this post must have at least a passing interest in literature services, so some of you might like to know about a job going at the EBI for a Team Leader in the Literature Service Development.

Postgenomic TrackBack

Similar items from Scintilla

Comments

Well, I just went to try it out but it keeps cycling on step 2/3 when trying I try to create a 'My Concept Web'

I know its 'beta' but basic functionality shouldn't be something that fails in a beta. Here's one mind that won't be listening.

Coincidentally, the article is also the most highly cited by Connotea users this week as well:

http://www.hotcites.com/

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are useful in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not to publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.

We have designed this blog to be as accessible to as many people as possible. If you are having difficulty leaving a comment because of the graphical security code below, please send your comment to 'nascent at nature.com'



"Nascent Web publishing efforts have their genesis in a burning need to say something, but their ultimate success comes from people wanting to listen, needing to hear each other’s voices, and answering in kind."
Rick Levine
The Cluetrain Manifesto

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

The Life Scientists on FriendFeed

Recent Comments

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2