« Long Tails: just how we roll | Main | Work for Nature, Go to SciFoo »

RSS subscriber numbers for science blogs

All your Google Reader stats are belong to us.

Following on from the blogroll data I took a look at the subscriber counts in Google Reader for each science blog that we track.

Some things to bear in mind before trying to make sense of the data:

  • Google Reader is one RSS reader of many. Anecdotally it accounts for between 30%-70% (big range) of all RSS subscribers.
  • Some blogs are going to have more old school 'refresh the page' vs RSS traffic than others, so this doesn't answer any 'does x have more readers than y' type questions.
  • A subset of blogs have more than one feed (Atom and RSS variants, for example), I'm only counting one - the one submitted to Scintilla or Nature.com Blogs. That could significantly affect results for some blogs.
  • Number of subscribers != number of people actively reading their subscriptions
  • I've left the raw numbers out again, though you can probably work some out from the graph below.

That said, here are the top thirty science blogs by Google Reader subscriptions (#15 - #30 are below the fold):

Rank Blog
#1Pharyngula
#2Mind Hacks
#3Bad Astronomy
#4Science Blog - Science news straight from the source
#5Good Math, Bad Math
#6Wired Science
#7WSJ.com: Health Blog
#8Cognitive Daily
#9PsyBlog
#10Not Even Wrong
#11Environmental Graffiti
#12BPS Research Digest
#13The n-Category Cafe
#14Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends
#15Cocktail Party Physics

And here's the obligatory long tailed graph:

blogsubs.png

Pharyngula is, again, way ahead of the pack - PZ is pretty much King of the Science Blogosphere any way you shake it (well, except one. And even then he's in the top ten). The Panda's Thumb is at #26 this time. Interestingly the top ten blogs by blogroll is otherwise almost completely different to the top ten blogs by subscriber count (that's not to say that the blogrolled blogs aren't popular: they are, just not in the top ten most popular in this context).

2.5-5k subscribers might not seem an awful lot, but it's pretty good going. Boing Boing has around 28k subscribers in Reader (this seemed very low to me, perhaps they've changed feed address recently)? The Nature journal TOC is delivered to around 4,800 Reader users. This blog has 468. The BBC News science and technology feed goes to 6,722.

For even more context - beware, not comparing like with like here so take with a pinch of salt - the average mid-tier science journal might print 450 copies (you could extrapolate wildly to get the number of actual readers by multiplying by ten or twelve).

Anyway, the top fifteen is a pretty mixed bag, I can't see many common themes. 4 are neuroscience / psychology related (BPS Digest, Mind Hacks, PsyBlog and Cognitive Daily) and 4 are associated with publications of some sort in real life (Mind Hacks, Not Even Wrong, Wired, WSJ). Suggestions / analysis welcome.

Rank Blog
#16Bad Science
#17Savage Minds: Notes and Queries in Anthropology ? A Group Blog
#18Social Science Statistics Blog
#19The Loom
#20Developing Intelligence
#21The Panda's Thumb
#22Uncertain Principles
#23Mixing Memory
#24Climate Progress
#25john hawks weblog
#26blog.khymos.org
#27CogNews
#28About.com Archaeology
#29Respectful Insolence
#30NHS Blog Doctor

Postgenomic TrackBack

Similar items from Scintilla

Comments

You may like this Greasemonkey script, which (allegedly) displays # of Google Reader subscribers for any page with a feed:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/21909

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the editors before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive. We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are useful in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately, or notify you in case we decide not to publish your comment. Email addresses will not be made public on the blog.

We have designed this blog to be as accessible to as many people as possible. If you are having difficulty leaving a comment because of the graphical security code below, please send your comment to 'nascent at nature.com'



"Nascent Web publishing efforts have their genesis in a burning need to say something, but their ultimate success comes from people wanting to listen, needing to hear each other’s voices, and answering in kind."
Rick Levine
The Cluetrain Manifesto

Subscribe

Subscribe to this blog's feeds:

[What is this?]

The Life Scientists on FriendFeed

Recent Comments

Out of 368 total comments.
The most recent three were on:
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2