Plutonium spotted far from Fukushima

Plutonium sample sites in JapanA paper out today in the journal Scientific Reports shows evidence that radioactive plutonium spread tens of kilometres from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. The new work could lead people to believe that there is a health risk, but that is not the case.

Plutonium is a radioactive element that is made inside nuclear reactors. Unlike some of the other contaminants to come from Fukushima, it is not volatile, and it is much harder for plutonium to escape from a nuclear reactor during a meltdown. That doesn’t mean it can’t happen: when Chernobyl’s Unit 4 reactor exploded in 1984, it released a large quantity of plutonium into the surrounding environment.

Plutonium can be dangerous. When it decays, it usually releases heavy particles such as electrons and helium nuclei. These particles aren’t particularly dangerous outside the body, but if plutonium is ingested they can cause genetic damage.

The new paper shows that minute quantities of plutonium from Fukushima have spread far from the plant. In samples taken to the northwest and in the J-Village, where workers live, the authors found trace amounts of plutonium in the surface soil (see map). Looking at the ratio of plutonium-241 to plutonium-239, they were able to conclude that the plutonium came from Fukushima rather than other sources, such as old nuclear-weapon tests.

The additional exposure from inhaling this loose plutonium at the S2 site is around 0.5 millisieverts (mSv) over 50 years.

This dose — 0.5 mSv over half a century — is five times higher than the government’s current estimate for plutonium exposure from the accident, but it doesn’t mean there’s a health risk. Over the same period, the average person on Earth would receive 120 mSv from natural sources of radiation. Even for those who worry about low-dose radiation, it’s safe to say that this additional plutonium exposure won’t have an impact.

Nevertheless, the measurements are interesting. The distances at which the team finds the material imply that plutonium was ejected during the hydrogen explosions in the first days of the crisis. And the relatively low levels (around 10,000 times lower than Chernobyl) suggest that the heavily shielded concrete casings around the reactors did offer some protection from the worst of the fallout.

There’s another reason this work is important. As we report this week, mistrust is running high among residents in Japan. Independent measurements such as these are extremely important in providing residents and evacuees with the information they need to get on with their lives. In this case, the measurements show little additional risk. But news of plutonium, no matter how small, will no doubt be dispiriting to the residents of Fukushima.

German vessel sets out to explore quake-struck seafloor off Japan

One year after the devastating Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, Japanese oceanographers and geologists are teaming up with German scientists to uncover any traces that the the magnitude-9 quake might have left on the sea floor. The scientists will search for geomorphological evidence of what exactly happened on 11 March last year during the two-and-a-half-minute rupture that released massive amounts of seismic energy and triggered a deadly tsunami off the northeastern coast of Honshu.

The 33-strong crew, led by Gerold Wefer of the University of Bremen, will set out on 8 March from the port of Yokohama on a four-week expedition aboard the German research vessel the Sonne (pictured). The German science ministry is providing €1.5 million (roughly US$2 million) to fund the cruise, with German and Japanese funding agencies providing additional support. You can follow the expedition here.

The team will use the Bremen-built MARUM-SEAL, an unmanned submersible equipped with advanced sonar technology, to map in great detail the 2,000-metre-deep sea floor around the quake epicentre. Japanese scientists mapped several segments of the sea floor in 1999 and 2004. The Sonne crew will re-map the same profiles, to allow scientists to compare sea-floor morphology before and after the quake.

Scientists suspect that the extraordinary force of the tsunami, which killed some 20,000 people, may have been the combined result of the sea floor rising with a jolt by up to five metres and of quake-triggered slides of the Japanese continental shelf. The team will search for clues of either mechanism: the fine-scaled pattern of horizontal and vertical displacement of the crust beneath the ocean floor and the amount and origin of sediment that may have slid into the 7,000 metre-deep Japan trench will shed light on the fateful chain of events and help constrain the precise source of the tsunami, they hope.

“In the light of the tragic events last year the stability of the continental shelf off Honshu is a key research topic,” says Wefer. “We are glad that we can assist our Japanese colleagues with precious ship time. I hope that this cruise will mark the beginning of a close collaboration between our countries in marine sciences.”

The expedition will also target the sites of two drill holes made more than ten years ago by the US vessel JOIDES Resolution under the Ocean Drilling Programme. If the metal casings and electrical connections of the sealed drilling holes are still intact, the team will install there a set of instruments for recording seismic waves. For that purpose, the Sonne hosts the University of Bremen’s remotely operated diving vehicle MARUM-QUEST, which can operate in water depths up to 4,000 metres.

In a separate expedition, the recently modernized Japanese drilling ship the CHIKYU will in April drill into the fault zone and take temperature measurements near the epicentre of the quake to confirm various theories about friction in faults.

Image:  RF Forschungsschiffahrt Bremen.

After Fukushima, emergency back-up equipment recommended for US nuclear reactors

The United States may follow France in recommending that nuclear power plants build new equipment dedicated to containing a serious accident, in the wake of the Fukushima meltdowns.

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) said on 11 January that  it considered as “a reasonable starting point” a plan put forward by the Washington DC-based Nuclear Energy Institute, a body representing the nuclear industry, to reinforce safety at US power plants.

The plan would involve placing portable pumps, generators, batteries and other emergency equipment at various locations around power plants — a mobile system that could be brought into play in the event of a serious accident providing extra resources to try to prevent a degeneration into a meltdown. The NRC is now reviewing what measures are needed to learn the lessons of Fukushima, and is expected to announce new rules before the 11 March anniversary of the accident.

This new focus on also having equipment dedicated to containing an accident is similar to that of sweeping French rules announced earlier this month, requiring all reactors to build a set of safety systems of last resort. But the French plan goes further, requiring the systems to be contained in bunkers that will be hardened to withstand more extreme earthquakes, floods and other threats than the plants themselves are designed to cope with.

“Simply buying some additional emergency equipment will do little to enhance safety unless it is protected against more severe events than plants are currently able to withstand and it is rugged and highly reliable. Otherwise, a severe event may render the new equipment as unusable as the existing equipment, says Ed Lyman, a nuclear expert with the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington DC. “The French plan appears to address this. However, in the US the standards for the reliability of the new equipment have yet to be determined, and industry is unlikely to support requirements that the equipment meets the highest standards for protection against extreme events.”

Fukushima reaches cold shutdown

The Fukushima nuclear plant / TEPCO

Today the Japanese government announced that three reactors that suffered meltdowns in early March had officially reached “cold shutdown”. Perhaps inevitably, many in the press are reporting the announcement as a “major milestone” in the Fukushima saga. But in truth, cold shutdown will mean very little in any practical sense for what goes on at the plant. Nor is it likely to change the fate of the thousands of evacuees who were forced to leave their homes after the Fukushima crisis.

First a little bit about what the term technically means. Nuclear power reactors use energy from splitting atoms to heat water until it boils into steam. That steam is in turn used to turn a turbine, which produces power. When the nuclear reactions are halted, the reactor core doesn’t cool off right away. Instead, it continues to heat water to above boiling point. For a set period of time, usually a matter of hours after reactor is halted, it must be cooled actively with recirculated water. When the reactor temperature drops below 100 °C, active cooling is no longer needed in the reactor becomes passively safe. This is known in the business as cold shutdown.

As of 15 December, temperatures in the three reactor vessels known to have melted down were well below 100 °C. According to the latest data from the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum, which tracks the reactors’ vital statistics, unit 1 is now at 38.3 °C, unit 2 is at 68.7 °C and unit 3 is at 64.1 °C. The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), which runs Fukushima, had imposed an additional requirement that the release of radioactivity is “under control and public radiation exposure by additional release is being significantly held down”. It has been months since any major release from the reactors, and it seems reasonable to consider this condition achieved as well.

Continue reading

Japan funds projects to clean up Fukushima

Fukushima 11 Nov.jpgPosted on behalf of David Cyranoski.

With the Fukushima nuclear reactors seemingly under control, the Japanese government is now facing the daunting task of cleaning up the highly contaminated areas around the reactors so that residents can move back. But it is estimated that more than 100 million cubic metres of soil and debris will need to be removed. Where does one begin?

On Monday, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) selected three major decontamination demonstration projects. On Wednesday it followed with the announcement of another 25 grants for smaller, technology-based projects.

The goal for each of the three demonstration projects is to show the capability of reducing radiation levels to less than 20 millisieverts a year ― the legal threshold at which people must be evacuated ― “with an economically feasible, efficient, and effective decontamination method that limits the amount of radioactive waste as much as possible while ensuring the safety of workers”, according to the JAEA.

Each group will receive roughly ¥600 million (US$7.7 million) for each of the four cities or towns for which it will take responsibility. Taisei Corporation, for example, will be covering Minamisoma, Kawamata, Namie, and Iitate. The 12 towns are all either in the original 20-kilometre exclusion zone or in the extended exclusion zone covering the plume to the northwest where high levels of radioactive material fell (see Does Japan’s new Fukushima exclusion zone add up?).

Continue reading

Hint of new fission at Fukushima reactor no cause for alarm

Scientists have downplayed the significance of the detection of radioactive xenon at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan, announced today.

As xenon radionuclides have short half-lives of up to just a few days, the detection, if confirmed, would mean that nuclear fission reactions of some form had restarted. But experts say that small amounts of fission in the reactor core would not be that surprising, and there seems no danger of either a self-sustaining critical chain reaction or significant release of fission products into the environment. Nature has also learned that ultrasensitive radionuclide detectors in the region, part of a global system to detect minute radionuclide signatures from atomic bomb tests, have so far not detected a trace of any newly-released xenon.

Tepco, the company that operates the Fukushima power plant, announced earlier today that nuclide analyses of exhaust gas from the reactor containment vessel of reactor 2 yesterday found a possible detection of xenon-133 (half life of just over 5 days) and xenon-135 (half-life of 9.14 hours). It noted, however, that there was no change in the temperature or pressure of the reactor, and no increase in radiation levels around the plant. Nonetheless, as a precaution it today injected into the reactor a solution of boric acid which strongly absorbs neutrons and so dampens fission reactions.

Continue reading

Japan begins thyroid screening for Fukushima children

Japan has launched a long-term project to monitor children near the Fukushima nuclear plant for thyroid problems.

Yesterday health workers tested the first 100 of a planned 360,000 children who were under 18 when the crisis began in March. They will be tested again every two years until they turn 20, then every five years thereafter.

Children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to thyroid damage from radioactive iodine – the New York Times reports that at least 4,000 cases of thyroid cancer in children have been linked to the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown. Previous screening of children around Fukushima showed minimal doses of radioactive iodine (see ‘Fukushima health risks scrutinized’).

Read all of Nature’s coverage of the Fukushima disaster here. For coverage in Japanese, go here.

Japan freezes fast breeder plans

Monju, Japan’s prototype fast breeder reactor, has had its research budget slashed. This might not come as a big surprise, given the anti-nuke sentiment in Japan and the tattered state of its nuclear energy policy. Still, with this latest blow, the woeful state of the ill-fated reactor is all the more striking. It could be maintained — with the help of a one-off Y20 billion yen (US$262 million) allocation — but the annual research budget will be cut 70%~80% from its previous Y10 billion.

Monju reached criticality in 1994 but was shut down the following year because of a fire triggered by a sodium coolant leak. It took the government over 14 years to demonstrate safety, overcome scandals related to tampered video images, and garner local support for restarting operations. But then, three months after it did so in May 2010, something happened that is still difficult to fathom. In August, 3.3-tonne device fell into the reactor’s inner vessel, cutting off access to the plutonium and uranium fuel rods. After a couple failed attempts, they finally dislodged the device in June 2011.

Monju was to be the cornerstone of Japan’s plans to use MOX (mixed oxide) fuel, but those plans seem to have disintegrated. Monju already faced fiery opposition.

One might start to wonder how much longer it can limp along.

VIDEO: Fukushima nuclear crisis, six months later

The meltdown of three nuclear reactors at the Fukushima power plant has led to an ongoing crisis in Japan. Nature Video provides an update on efforts to stabilize the reactors, and the consequences of the emergency for Japan and nuclear power worldwide.

Check out our previous video on the emergency itself.

See also our news special on the Fukushima crisis, and our coverage in Japanese.

Directly comparing Fukushima to Chernobyl

Zoom out to view Chernobyl’s radiation over Fukushima. Rotate to the Ukraine to see Chernobyl in context. Download File (source: UNSCEAR/MEXT)
This embedded version of Google Earth may have limited functionality on some browsers.

This Sunday (11 September) marks the six-month anniversary of the triple meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan. The accident has slipped from the headlines, but new data are coming out all the time. Some of the most recent findings are allowing the best comparison yet of Fukushima with Chernobyl.

A lot of media outlets (ourselves included) first made the Fukushima-Chernobyl comparison back in April, when the Japanese revised their estimate of the Fukushima accident—rating it a seven on the seven-point international INES scale. The conclusion most reached at the time was that, although the rating was the same, Fukushima was a much smaller accident.

A couple of things have changed since those first reports. First, the Japanese doubled their estimate of the radiation released by Fukushima in June to 7.7×1017 Becquerels (Bq). Then, on 30 August, they released the first maps of radioactive caesium-137 (Cs-137) contamination from the plant. Cs-137 has a half-life of 30 years, and it’s considered the major long-term contaminate for both accidents.

With the new Cs-137 data, we can now directly compare the fallout from Chernobyl to Fukushima. Check out the Google Earth mashup above (zoom out to see Chernobyl on top of Fukushima, and rotate over to the Ukraine to see Chernobyl in context).

Continue reading