February’s SoNYC: On Science and Social Media – Introduction

February’s Science Online NYC (SoNYC) co-organised by nature.com, is a super social media week special event at the American Museum of Natural History!  You can join us on Thursday February 16th in person, or online via the social media week livestream to discuss Beyond a Trend: Enhancing Science Communication with Social Media:

As a communications tool, social media is an undeniably effective way to enhance your message. But within the science realm, top communicators – both academic and professional – strive to use social media for something greater: to engage the public in a conversation about science. Never before has it been so easy for researchers, public information officers, educators, students, and journalists to talk directly to the public about the benefits, limits, and implications of scientific knowledge. Social media not only makes these meaningful conversations possible, but it often also makes them fun and compelling. During this session, hear from scientists, communicators, and educators who use social media tools and the philosophy behind them to find creative, collaborative, and engaging learning opportunities.

This month’s panel:

– American Museum of Natural History educators who are developing a “tool kit” of mobile apps, websites and more to help middle school students collect, share and present data on urban biodiversity

– Ben Lillie, the co-organizer of The Story Collider, which tells science stories by combining verbal narratives with podcasts, Twitter and an online magazine

– Matt Danzico, a BBC journalist who conducted a 365-day blog experiment called “The Time Hack” looking at how we perceive time

– Carl Zimmer, a science journalist whose latest book, Science Ink: Tattoos of the Science Obsessed, is based on feedback he received on his Discover Magazine blog when he asked the question: are scientists hiding tattoos of their science?

– Moderator: Jennifer Kingson, day assignment editor, Science Department, The New York Times

Continuing the discussion 

To prepare for the upcoming discussion, we’re running a series of guest posts here on Of Schemes and Memes, recounting experiences where social media has been a key part of an education project.

The advent of social media has seen the birth of wider online initiatives aiming to engage the public with science. For example: the BBC’s So you want to be a scientist, a weekly science show that turns science ideas into real-life experiments, I am a scientist get me out of here (IAS), an X-factor style competition where students talk to scientists online for 2 weeks and vote for their favourite scientist, and Google’s Science Fair, the largest global online science competition. These projects aim to disseminate science effectively to wider audiences and celebrate the curiosity of young scientists. In our upcoming guest posts we will feature anecdotes from the participants of such projects as well as hear from an academic using social media as part of a university course, and consider the future of social media as an aid for learning.

The three scientists sharing their personal experiences are:

Dr Alan Cann from Leicester University. He will be giving an academic’s viewpoint on how social media can be used as part of the curriculum. His post considers how the effects of social media usage can be measured and what the future holds for such technology in the classroom.

– Dr Tom Crick, a senior lecturer in Computer Science, will talk about his experiences with the IAS competition, including a personal take on how he uses social media to aid learning.

– Ben Lillie, co-organizer of The Story Collider and one of the SoNYC panellists, will discuss how he uses social media to organise events and engage people online.

If you are keen to learn more about disseminating science using social media and other discussion forums, check out the write-up of December’s SoNYC and the following presentation by Christie Wilcox:

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) 8 – Thinking Digital: Giving your research more reach (and making sure others can find it)

On Wednesday evening, we hosted the eighth installment of the monthly Science Online NYC (SoNYC) discussion series. The topic for debate this month was, “Thinking Digital: Giving your research more reach (and making sure others can find it)” and the panel featured:

  • Mark Hahnel is the developer of Figshare.
  • Carol Feltes is the head librarian at Rockefeller University.
  • Veronique Kiermer is an Executive Editor and Head of Researcher Services at Nature, and a member of the ORCID steering committee.
  • Cathy Norton is the library scholar at the Biodiversity Heritage Library at Woods Hole’s Marine Biological Laboratory.

As is our usual format, following short introductory talks from the panelists, we invited attendees present in person at Rockefeller University or watching online to take part in a wider discussion.

To read what people on Twitter were saying about the event, check out our Storify of tweets at the bottom of this post.

Blog posts about the 8th #sonyc

Do let us know if you blog about the event and we’ll include a round-up of links here.

Live-streaming and video archiving

We live-stream each SoNYC event to give as many people as possible the chance to take part in the debate. Check out our livestream channel where the archives of the meetings can also be found.

Finding out more

The next SoNYC will be held on February 16th and will be a special event at the American Museum of Natural History for social media week.  Details will be announcedsoon – keep an eye on the SoNYC twitter account for more details and/or watch the #sonyc hashtag.

If you have a suggestion for a future panel or would be interested in sponsoring one of the events, please get in touch.

This month’s Storify

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) 7 – Matching medium and messengers to meet the masses

On Thursday evening, we hosted the seventh installment of the monthly Science Online NYC (SoNYC) discussion series. The topic for debate this month was, “Matching medium and messengers to meet the masses” and the panel featured:

  • Darlene Cavalier is the woman behind the Science Cheerleaders.
  • Jamie Vernon, a science policy analyst.
  • Molly Webster, lead producer for live programming at the World Science Festival.
  • Kevin Zelnio is Assistant Editor and Webmaster for Deep Sea News and a freelance writer.

As is our usual format, following short introductory talks from the panelists, we invited attendees present in person atRockefellerUniversityor watching online to take part in a wider discussion.

To read what people on Twitter were saying about the event, check out our Storify of tweets at the bottom of this post.

Blog posts about the 7th #sonyc

Do let us know if you blog about the event and we’ll include a round-up of links here:

WSF Blog Introduction 

Simon Fischweicher’s summary

Philip Yam’s observations

Live-streaming and video archiving

We live-stream each SoNYC event to give as many people as possible the chance to take part in the debate. Check out ourlivestream channel where the archives of the meetings can also be found.

Finding out more

The next SoNYC will be held in January and details will be announced in the next few weeks – keep an eye on the SoNYC twitter account for more details and/or watch the #sonychashtag.

If you have a suggestion for a future panel or would be interested in sponsoring one of the events, please get in touch.

This month’s Storify

 

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) 6 – In the news, but not reviewed

On Thursday evening, we hosted the sixth installment of the monthly Science Online NYC (SoNYC) discussion series. The topic for debate this month was, “In the news, but not reviewed” and the panel featured:

  • John Matson covers astronomy for Scientific American.
  • Maia Szalavitz is a journalist who focuses on neuroscience. Her current focus is on Time.com’s Healthland.
  • John Timmer is the science editor for Ars Technica, and has trained his managing editor to recognize when a news story contains the word “arXiv”.

As is our usual format, following short introductory talks from the panelists, we invited attendees present in person at Rockefeller University or watching online to take part in a wider discussion.

To read what people on Twitter were saying about the event, check out our Storify of tweets at the bottom of this post.

Blog posts about the 6th #sonyc

Do let us know if you blog about the event and we’ll include a round-up of links here.

Photos

Have been added to our Facebook page. Do let us know if you’d like us to link to any of yours.

Live-streaming and video archiving

We do also live-stream each SoNYC event to give as many people as possible the chance to take part in the debate. Check out our livestream channel where the archives of the first five meetings are currently hosted.

Finding out more

The next SoNYC will be held in December and will be on Citizen Science. The details of December’s event will be announced soon – keep an eye on the SoNYC twitter account for more details and/or watch the #sonyc hashtag.

If you have a suggestion for a future panel or would be interested in sponsoring one of the events, please get in touch.

This month’s Storify

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) 5 – Enhanced eBooks & BookApps: the Promise and Perils

On Tuesday evening, we hosted the fifth installment of the monthly Science Online NYC (SoNYC) discussion series at Rockefeller University in NYC. The topic for debate this month was “Enhanced eBooks & BookApps: the Promise and Perils” and the panel featured:

• David Dobbs, moderator (As well as an author, blogger, and ebook experimentalist).

• John Dupuis, science librarian at York University and blogger at Confessions of a Science Librarian.

• Evan Ratliff, co-founder and editor, The Atavist.

• Amanda Moon, senior editor, FSG/Scientific American Books.

• Carl Zimmer, author, journalist, and blogger.

• Dean Johnson, creative director of Brandwidth, developer of The Exoplanets, an iPad book/app to be published this fall by Scientific American Books/FSG.

As is our usual format, following short introductory talks from the panelists, we invited attendees present in person or watching online to take part in a wider discussion.

Some questions that the panel discussed included: How do we develop AppBooks or enhanced eBooks that make the most of the technology without locking the contents in proprietary formats that may be hard to crack open in 5 or 50 years? How can we reconcile the desires and agendas of authors, app developers, publishers, librarians, archivists, and readers?

To read what people on Twitter were saying about the event, check out our Storify of tweets at the bottom of this post.

Photos

Have been added to our Facebook page. Do let us know if you’d like us to link to any of yours.

Live-streaming and video archiving

We do also live-stream each SoNYC event to give as many people as possible the chance to take part in the debate. Check out our livestream channel where the archives of the first four meetings are currently hosted.

Other blog posts about #sonyc 5

Do let us know if you blog about the event and we’ll include a round-up of links here.

SONYC Presentation: Enhanced eBooks & BookApps: the Promise and Perils

Ebooks and science: Livestreamed tonight

Finding out more

The next event will be held in October, keep an eye on the SoNYC twitter account for more details and/or watch the #sonyc hashtag. If you have a suggestion for a future panel or would be interested in sponsoring one of the events, please get in touch.

This month’s Storify

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) 4 – Reaching the niches

On Wednesday evening, we hosted the fourth installment of the monthly Science Online NYC (SoNYC) discussion series. The topic for debate this month was “Reaching the niches: connecting underrepresented groups with science” and the panel featured:

• Khadijah Britton: Founder of BetterBio, a nonprofit focused on helping minority communities connect with science.

Meghan Groome: Director of the NY Academy of Science’s K-12 Education and Science & the City programs.

Dhiraj Murthy: An assistant professor at Bowdoin College, where he studies the use of social media tools within minority communities.

Nancy Parmalee: A graduate student at Columbia University.

Daniel Colón Ramos: Director of CienciaPR, a group dedicated to promoting scientific collaborations and literacy in Puerto Rico.

Bernice Rumala: Co-chair of Rockefeller University’s Achieving Successful and Productive Academic Research Careers (SPARC) initiative.

As is our usual format, following short introductory talks from the panelists, we invited attendees present in person at Rockefeller University or watching online to take part in a wider discussion.

To read what people on Twitter were saying about the event, check out our Storify of tweets at the bottom of this post.

Photos

Have been added to our Facebook page. Do let us know if you’d like us to link to any of yours.

Live-streaming and video archiving

We do also live-stream each SoNYC event to give as many people as possible the chance to take part in the debate. Check out our livestream channel where the archives of the first two meetings are currently hosted.

Of Schemes and Memes blog posts around the themes of the 4th #sonyc

To complement this SoNYC discussion, on Of Schemes and Memes we have been delving into the world of minority scientists. Our first installment from Jeanne Garbarino, a Postdoc at Rockefeller University, considered some of the underrepresented groups within science. In our second installment, Mónica I. Feliú-Mójer discussed her role as the vice-director of Ciencia Puerto Rico, a non-profit, grassroots organization that promotes science, research and scientific literacy in Puerto Rico. Our third post was from Subhra Priyadarshini, editor of Nature Publishing Group’s India portal who talked about life for scientists in India. In our forth post we heard from Satoshi Uchiyama, a Japanese researcher working abroad, as he details his career hurdles and visa issues. In our last post, we heard from Amanda Adeleye, a medical student who reveals that the glamorous world of cheerleading can mix with science.

Other blog posts about #sonyc 4

Making Science Relevant

Do let us know if you blog about the event and we’ll include a round-up of links here.

Finding out more

The next event will be held in September and will focus on Enhanced eBooks & BookApps: the Promise and Perils. Keep an eye on the SoNYC twitter account for more details and/or watch the #sonyc hashtag.

If you have a suggestion for a future panel or would be interested in sponsoring one of the events, please get in touch.

This month’s Storify

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) 3 – Science and the Law

On Wednesday evening, we hosted the third installment of the monthly Science Online NYC (SoNYC) discussion series. The topic for debate this month was “Science and the Law” and the panel featured Nadim Shohdy, Matt Berntsen Simon Singh (who kindly stayed up late in the UK so that he could join us via Skype) and Dan Vorhaus.

As is our usual format, following short introductory talks from the panelists, we invited attendees present in person at Rockefeller University or watching online to take part in a wider discussion.

On saying the right thing – Libel and the Law

The evening began with an introduction by Simon Singh on his experiences of being sued for libel in England, highlighting some key differences in the Law in the UK and the US. One of the questions from the audience was whether Singh would write the same article again if he’d known what he knows now. Singh reflected that yes, there were things that could potentially have been done such as not naming an organisation or slightly softening the tone used, but the key issue here was why should a journalist feel scared to do their job?

Later in the evening, Matt Berntsen began his talk with a two sentence definition of libel laws in the US, which stressed the importance of consent. Translating for the less legally-aware in the audience, Dan Vorhaus explained that if you interview or write a piece about an individual or an organisation and they OK it before you publish it, they cannot later sue you about its contents.

Singh’s libel discussions concluded with some crowd-sourced advice for all bloggers to check out online guidelines by Sense about Science in the UK and Electronic Frontier Foundation in the US about libel laws.

Whose gene is it anyway?

Nadim Shohdy chose to focus on patent law in the US, giving an overview of the Bayh-Dole Act, which is the US legislation that relates to research work that is funded by federal government. Its outcome was to give universities (and others) the intellectual property rights to their inventions.

Discussions later in the evening returned to patents, specifically whether or not it should be possible to patent individual genes. A loose explanation of current situation in the US is that discoveries cannot be patented, whereas inventions can be. To date, genes have fallen into the latter category as they are “created” in lab. However, ongoing legal discussion around the BRCA genes involved in breast cancer may result in changes to the previously accepted status quo.

On the side of the Law…and the scientists

In the final set of comments before everyone moved to the bar to continue the discussions, Dan Vorhaus brought the elephant in the room around Science and Law out onto the stage in an attempt to promote further dialogue. Aware that lawyers are stereotypically seen as unapproachable and “unsexy,” and that, frustratingly, Law often trails some years behind scientific advances, Vorhaus asked how scientists and lawyers could develop closer collaborations. One suggestion included scientists helping lawyers to identify developments that are likely to have policy and/or legal implications. For example, rapidly falling costs of DNA sequencing were clearly going to lead to a wider accessibility and use of personal genomics. However, there is still only one piece of legislation specifically relating to the use of genetic material – other legal decisions are taken by interpreting and re-purposing other areas of Law, a situation which is less than optimal.

To read what people on Twitter were saying about the event, check out our Storify of tweets at the bottom of this post.

Blog posts about the 3rd #sonyc

Do let us know if you blog about the event and we’ll include a round-up of links here.

Photos

Have been added to our Facebook page. Do let us know if you’d like us to link to any of yours.

Live-streaming and video archiving

We do also live-stream each SoNYC event to give as many people as possible the chance to take part in the debate. Check out our livestream channel where the archives of the first two meetings are currently hosted.

Finding out more

There will not be a SoNYC in July as we are taking the month off, so the next event will be held in August. The details of August’s event will be announced soon – keep an eye on the SoNYC twitter account for more details and/or watch the #sonyc hashtag.

If you have a suggestion for a future panel or would be interested in sponsoring one of the events, please get in touch.

This month’s Storify

NB. Please let us know of any mistakes in the recounting of the legal definitions from this event so that we can correct them.

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) 2 – Are scientists anti-social?

On Monday, we hosted our second installment of the monthly Science Online NYC (SoNYC) discussion series. The "topic ":https://sonyc2.eventbrite.com/ for debate this month was “Are scientists antisocial when it comes to the adoption of social media and web 2.0 tools for research?” and the panel featured Arikia Millikan, James Hedges, "Jessica Mezei ":https://twitter.com/#!/jmezi and Lou Woodley.

As is our usual format, following short introductory talks from the panelists, we invited attendees present in person at Rockefeller University or watching online to take part in a wider discussion. There were several key themes including the question of whether scientists are only anti-social at certain points of the research cycle because of the need to protect data and maximise publications. Post-publication, however, we’re seeing enthusiastic adoption by some scientists of Twitter, blogs and other social media tools.

You can read a selection of the tweets from the event in our Storify at the end of this post.

Blog posts about the 2nd #sonyc

Are scientists anti-social? Audrey Quinn’s overview of the evening

Are scientists anti-social? – part 1 and part 2 by Sourabh Banerjee.

Photos

Have been added to our Facebook page. Do let us know if you’d like us to link to any of yours.

Live-streaming and video archiving

We do also live-stream each SoNYC event to give as many people as possible the chance to take part in the debate. Check out our livestream channel where the archives of the first two meetings are currently hosted.

Unfortunately, we had some tech issues with the streaming this month and so the archive has some sound issues in places. To ensure this doesn’t happen again, we’re looking for someone who would be willing to “babysit” a video camera on a tripod at the venue so that we have a back-up recording. We already have the equipment and don’t require any technical expertise, just a willingness to come along and help out, so if you’d be interested, please "get in touch. ":mailto:l.woodley@nature.com

Finding out more

The details of next month’s event will be announced soon – keep an eye on the SoNYC twitter "account ":https://twitter.com/#!/S_O_NYC for more details and/or watch the #sonyc hashtag.

If you have a suggestion for a future panel or would be interested in sponsoring one of the events, please get in touch.

This month’s Storify

Science Online NYC (SoNYC) – April feedback and May’s event

Last month we were delighted to “launch “:https://blogs.nature.com/u6e5b2ce1/2011/03/17/announcing-science-online-nyc-sonyc Science Online NYC (SoNYC), a monthly discussion series for anyone in and around New York who’s interested in how science is carried out and communicated online.

Our first event covering the theme; “Courting controversy: how to successfully engage an online audience with complex and/or controversial topics” was a big success. Not only did we have over 80 attendees, but we also live-streamed the event and live-tweeted. You can still watch the video archive here if you haven’t seen it yet.

We also created 3 Storify storyboards to archive the highlights of the twitter conversations around the event – there were more than 600 tweets using the #sonyc hashtag!

You can read blog posts discussing the event “here “:https://www.science3point0.com/themothergeek/2011/04/23/sonycs-courting-controversey-its-all-about-the-context/ and here. Please let us know if you’ve written a post about the event so that we can include it.

This month’s event will take place on Monday 16th May and will discuss whether scientists are anti-social when it comes to online tools and social networks for work:

The sharing of information and materials is an integral part of the scientific process. Many communities have found that online tools can greatly enhance this sort of sharing, but the scientific community appears to be lagging behind when it comes to the adoption of social software, even though scientists have embraced various digital tools as part of their regular workflow. Why the disconnect? Our panel will discuss the technical challenge of creating social media software for researchers, the difficulty of attracting a scientific audience, and why it’s so hard to get a group of scientists to agree on anything.

Panel to be announced shortly.

If you’d like to attend, please register via our Eventbrite page – we’re strictly limited to 100 attendees. Plus you don’t want to miss out on a name badge!

If you can’t attend in person, we’ll be streaming the event live here and you can follow it on Twitter using the hashtag #sonyc.

Announcing Science Online NYC! (SoNYC)

(Cross-posted from Of Schemes and Memes)

We’re delighted to be able to share some details of a new monthly event for anyone based in New York who’s interested in how science is carried out and communicated online.

Nature.com, in collaboration with co-organisers Jeanne Garbarino at Rockefeller University, "John Timmer ":https://twitter.com/#!/j_timmer at Ars Technica and Joe Bonner from Rockefeller and SWINY, will be hosting a monthly discussion series consisting of a panel debate followed by audience Q&A and post-debate networking. We’d love you to come along!

The first SoNYC event will take place on Wednesday 20th April from 7pm at Rockefeller University (Caspary 1A/B – location 5 on this map), later adjourning to the Faculty and Students Club on-campus bar. The topic for discussion is:

Courting Controversy: how to successfully engage an online audience with complex or controversial topics.

Climate change. Nuclear safety. Vaccination. These are topics where scientific and medical experts are nearly unanimous when it comes to the basics. But the public has remained uncertain and sometimes hostile to the scientific understanding, in part because of the efforts of vocal and well organized groups that argue against the consensus position. In other cases, like the recent events in Japan, expert opinions have been drowned out by rumors and a rush to provide coverage.

Join us to discuss how science communicators can help ensure that accurate information rises above the noise, and the challenges faced by experts who attempt to reach the public directly. Our panel includes researchers who have engaged the press and the public about climate change, vaccines, and the perception of risk.

Ken Bromberg is the director of the Vaccine Research Center at the Brooklyn Hospital Center, and has made frequent appearances in the media to discuss vaccine safety.

David Ropeik is a former journalist who now lectures and consults on risk perception. In recent entries at his blog, On Risk, he has tackled vaccines and nuclear safety.

Gavin Schmidt is a climate researcher at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and a driving force behind the RealClimate blog. His public outreach efforts have included an appearance on the Letterman Show.

The aim is to make these meet-ups as interactive as possible; please bring your ideas, your experiences and your enthusiasm for a lively debate and chance to meet other like-minded NYC sci comm. folks. Once we’ve held the first event, we’ll be asking for your feedback and suggestions for the next one so that this becomes an regular, inclusive opportunity for the discussion of all things related to how science is carried out and communicated online.

You can find us online at the following places:

Twitter: @S_O_NYC hashtag: #sonyc

Facebook: SoNYC page

Please let us know if you’re planning to come by signing up on Eventbrite as it helps to ensure we have the right sized room and enough for everyone to drink. Feel free to invite your colleagues and friends too. If you have any questions, do send Lou an email (l.woodley@nature.com).

Hope to see you in April!