As New Delhi grapples with last minute preparations for the Commonwealth Games due this October, wildlife bodies are concerned that illegal trade in wildlife products might see a spurt as thousands of tourists arrive here to participate in and see the coveted games.

A friend sent me prototypes of brand new public service announcements that are part of TRAFFIC India’s campaign advising tourists to exercise caution while buying souvenirs from India. Here’s a collage of the bright and creative posters that have messages like: “FREE!!! A pair of handcuffs and up to seven years in jail with every ivory product” and “FREE!!! Up to seven years accommodation in a prison cell with the purchase of any item made of protected reptile skins”.

A release accompanying the posters says the campaign is targeted at domestic and foreign tourists. The posters send a clear message that it is not only the poachers and traders of endangered wildlife who are liable for punishment under India’s Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, but also those who purchase and use such items. Tourists inadvertently become a party to illegal trade in wildlife products.

The “Don’t Buy Trouble” campaign has been launched at vantage points — airports, hotels/resorts and other significant tourist hotspots.

The fear is not unfounded. Illegal wildlife trade has almost threatened the very survival of many species in India. TRAFFIC India lists some such products — mongoose hair, snakeskin, rhino horn, tiger and leopard claws, bones, skins, whiskers, elephant tusks, deer antlers, turtle shells, musk pods, bear bile, medicinal plants, timber and caged birds such as parakeets, mynas and munias.

The idea to reinvent the campaign, running since 2008, during the high tourist footfall period is well thought of. It will go a long way in ensuring the Commonwealth Games do not get a rap from the wild side, in the least.

There’s a move to stop tiger tourism in India in the wake of concerns that the big cats are facing threats from tourists.

Soon, the core regions of 37 tiger reserves in the country will see no human footfalls and people living in these areas will be rehabilitated. Official figures suggest that the species has already disappeared or is endangered in 16 reserves largely due to poaching, and also due to habitat damage caused by tourism. Perched on top of elephants or vehicles, tourists end up destroying grasslands. Their abodes — cottages and hotels — are bad news for the tiger’s habitat.

A wild tiger at the Kanha National Park in Madhya Pradesh. ©M. K. S. Pasha.

The erosion is evident. A visit to most tiger reserves in this country leaves you with a wallet full of visiting cards of tourist guides, elephant-back tour organisers, so-called bird and wildlife guides, nature walkers and the likes. They have their ways to get you inside the core area.

Through anxious days and nights, you are promised the prized sighting but you have to be content with sundry other wildlife. The tiger is for the lucky few, you are made to believe in the end, and asked to contact the very same people for the ‘lucky sighting’ the next time around.

The move to stop tiger tourism in the core areas is a welcome one. In any case, there are very few big cats left to be preserved in the core areas. And only the lucky get to see them, anyway.

I engaged myself in the discussions emerging out of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) at Doha this week to sniff something that I have been meaning to write about for a while — the growing impact of internet and new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) on the conservation of wild fauna and flora. Participating countries recongnised the exploitation of these media by criminals and the need to find ways to tackle this.

How the law enforcement community can use the same media to turn the tables on criminals was the question most sought answers to. The Internet also connects legitimate traders of wildlife to tech-savvy consumers and so the biggest challenge is to find ways to help these consumers determine if the goods are legal and sustainably traded. Why, an elephant conservation and advocacy group keenly following the talks reported that the pachyderms had done fairly for themselves at Doha. They claim to have over 4000 fans of Facebook — an illustration of using new media to spread the word around!

What made for good news for Asian countries was an amended CITES resolution on the region’s big cats that called for comprehensive legislation and enforcement controls to regulate trade in tiger and other Asian Big Cats’ parts and derivatives. The resolution called for increased regional cooperation among tiger range states, improved reporting, establishment of a tiger trade database and introduction of innovative enforcement methods to curb such trade.

Indeed a step forward in times when scientists report that prioritisation based on demographic, genetic, and ecological considerations can ensure species recovery and retention of evolutionary flexibility in the face of ongoing global changes.

Attendee representatives from more than 100 governments, including most of the tiger range countries, sought funds to stop illegal trade in specimens of Asian big cat species. Governments and intergovernmental organisations, international aid agencies, and nongovernmental organisations should come forward to heed to this call.

Or who knows if there will be even ‘1411 left’, as a popular corporate tiger conservation campaign in India claims.

Close on the heels of Indian scientists demonstrating the invaluable genetic diversity of the subcontinent’s big cats, here’s some more good news for tiger conservation in India.

© WWF

Last week, India officially launched an online database of authentic record of tiger deaths and other key wildlife species across the country. Tigernet is a collaborative effort of the National Tiger Conservation Authority of the environment and forests ministry and TRAFFIC-India, the wildlife trade monitoring network.

The idea is to compile and analyse such data as a management tool for tiger conservation in India. The website is a refreshingly candid venture that promises to be a transparent official record of deaths of the big cats in India. It gives tiger reserve directors and chief wildlife wardens in India the ability to key-in crucial information about tiger deaths, poaching and seizures.

Conservation experts have been crying foul for long on the lack of accurate information on such issues. The website answers a lot of questions raised time and again by NGOs and conservation workers and should go a long way in assisting anti-poaching efforts.

By significantly simplifying the tiger death reporting system and even findings of post mortem examinations, the government has shown its willingness to go a step further in its seriousness over transparency in wildlife conservation efforts.