Reactions – Frank van Veggel

1. What made you want to be a chemist?

I had some great teachers in the natural sciences at high school in The Netherlands, and they and we did some crazy experiments. Somehow I was, and still am, fascinated by the fact that we can make molecules without actually seeing individual ones. I was trained as a chemical engineer, but I always liked the chemistry part of it most.

2. If you weren’t a chemist and could do any other job, what would it be – and why?

I would be seriously tempted to become a biochemist to be part of the incredible revolution that is happening there in genomics and proteomics. The chemistry in there is truly intriguing. Or breeding quarter horses.

3. How can chemists best contribute to the world at large?

From an academic point of view I would like to say to train the next generation of responsible chemists who will make better and safer products and drugs, and find new ways to minimize our pressure on the environment. In my research I try, for example, to make better and more potent contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), so that patients are better diagnosed with less (toxic) materials.

4. Which historical figure would you most like to have dinner with – and why?

Darwin. Why? It is quite amazing that he was so right in his theory on evolution.

5. When was the last time you did an experiment in the lab – and what was it?

If an experiment is helping one of my co-workers in the lab with a measurement counts the answer is, some weeks ago. A real experiment by myself was in the summer of 2005 when I worked for 2 months in Dr. M. Andrews’ lab at McGill, Montreal, Canada.

6. If exiled on a desert island, what one book and one CD would you take with you?

I cheat a bit, but I would take a series of 6 books about the Roman empire by McCullough and a CD by Gidon Kremer “Hommage to Piazzola”.

Frank van Veggel is in the Department of Chemistry, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada and works on luminescent nanoparticles for lasers, optical amplification and biolabels. Nanoparticles are also developed for MRI (magnetic resonance imaging).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sugar Daddy: Do not pass ‘Go’, do not collect $200

Posted on behalf of Sugar Daddy

The qualifying exam.

If there is ever a moment in graduate school that usually receives about 100 times more preparation and 100,000 times more anxiety than necessary, it is the qualifying exam. For those of you who are not in grad school (or those that have been through it and somehow, shockingly, blocked the thing from your memory), here’s a primer. Of course, it depends on the school, but the basic scenario is that as a second- or third-year student, you have to stand up in front of three or four professors and defend your research. Or so you think. It actually, I think, usually goes something more like this:

Student: “I’ve been interested in studying the mechanistic details of how [some enzyme that is inexplicably fascinating to you, your advisor, and maybe four other people on the face of the earth] is involved in the biosynthesis of [some natural product that sounds like a really nasty infection and always looks misspelled]. The locus for the gene was identified in—”

Professor 1: “Draw the structure of cytosine.”

Student: [Starts to draw structure of cytosine correctly]

Professor 2: [Interrupting] “Which is higher, the intracellular or extracellular concentrations of potassium in the central nervous system?”

Student: [Begins to answer, but stumbles]

Professor 2: “Why don’t you draw a neuron. What is the action potential? How do ion channels function in its propagation? What different types of ion channels exist? Which ions are the principal players, and what are their functions? What structural information exists on ion channels and what is the functional significance of the structural studies? What are the major classes of ion channel-blocking compounds? What are their relative affinities for different classes of ion channels?”

Student: “The action potential is—”

Professor 3: “Draw the mechanism for the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction.”

And so it goes… I guess what I can say is that you don’t really know what the professors will ask, and they will probably form an opinion of your ability in the first five minutes (if they hadn’t already by reading or hearing what your advisor had to say about you prior to your exam). So much for a blind audition…

Today, we will conclude with a haiku, in the poetic style that seems to be all the rage on the Sceptical Chymist:

Study as you wish

but predict the questions you

won’t. Good luck, sucker!

2 thoughts on “Sugar Daddy: Do not pass ‘Go’, do not collect $200

  1. I found it best to distribute to the committee a series of power point handouts. Thus, when a professor would go offtrack, I could always bring it back to the main focus of why I was there.

    Mitch

  2. I’ve met Prof #3, I am delivering a small presentation on palm oil, and she asked me to explain the 3 laws of thermodynamic (her field)…tsk..tsk..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *