Communication: talk to peers and the general public

Effective communication will improve the value of scientific discoveries, says Eleni Wood

As scientists, our work is often driven by data collection and results. But a key step in the scientific process, and one that increases the value of our findings, is the effective communication of our investigative processes and results. Science communication is not only important within our fields for the advancement of our disciplines – communication to other audiences also influences the public perception and credibility of scientists and the work we do.

network-1911678_1920 Continue reading

The discomfort is worth it: share more

Making sure to communicate with the public is hard and takes time. Scientists should keep doing it, says Jessica Eise.

When David Eagleman, a neuroscientist at Stanford, wrote the New York Times bestseller Incognito, I read it voraciously. The world of the mind opened to me. My subconscious brain took on an entirely new meaning to me. Eagleman’s research felt salient, relevant, and crucial to our understanding and progress as a species.

Knowledge-sharing

{credit}Asonlobo/Wikipedia; CC-BY-SA-4.0{/credit}

Continue reading

Out of the lab and onto the streets

Nicole Forrester recounts and reflects on her experience at the March for Science in Washington D.C.

April 22 began with a drizzly ride on rented bikes through the streets of southeast D.C. to the Washington monument. I was accompanied by Dylan Jones, an outdoor recreation and environmental writer from West Virginia. “I typically opt for escaping civilization on Earth Day,” Jones said, “but today I decided to go straight into the heart of it.” We weaved through roads littered with people in rain shells and lab coats, carrying vibrant signs and rainbow umbrellas.

Capitol-smaller-cropped

Continue reading

Five ways science communication can help you

Naturejobs journalism competition winner Rachel Harris explains how engaging others in science has benefitted her in the lab

For the past four years I’ve been working in science communication (SciComm), and academia. I’m now mid-way through my PhD — I’m studying on Alzheimer’s disease and I know I would be finding research a lot tougher if I were not involved with science communication.

RH_BNF2016_original-smaller

Rachel Harris doing some SciComm at Bristol Neuroscience Festival this year

Continue reading

Five top tips for getting your paper noticed

Your research breakthrough doesn’t just need to be read by the experts, says Mark Lorch.

Guest contributor Mark Lorch

You’ve just made the breakthrough you’ve been dreaming of. The days-weeks-months-years in the lab or field have all paid off, and everything has dropped into place. It’s the sort of moment that we scientists live for – the buzz of discovery. So now it’s time to publish.New Image

Tell your peers about your work and hope it leads to new and even greater things for you, your fellow scientists, and society. But is that really enough? Maybe there’s a wider audience for your science, outside of the narrow confines of your academic circle. Maybe it has applications in other fields, or perhaps the public would like to (or even should) know about it. Plus of course if you get your paper noticed it’s much more likely to have the citations and impact that you, your department and all the metric measurers have been hoping for.

In the open access era there’s nothing stopping anyone from downloading your paper. But there are still hurdles to overcome before getting the wide readership your paper deserves. Based on my experience, here’s five tips for helping your paper reach the widest possible audience. Continue reading

Why bother with public engagement?

By Heather Doran, contributor

In the lead-up to our Naturejobs Career Expo and conference in London tomorrow, where we will have a panel discussion on science communication, Heather Doran, a Project Officer in Public Engagement with Research at the University of Aberdeen, shares her thoughts on the benefits that public engagement can bring to scientists in this guest blog post.

istockphoto/Thinkstock

{credit}istockphoto/Thinkstock{/credit}

In order to perform well in both academia and industry researchers need to develop their personal skill sets to not only complete research but also write papers, teach and demonstrate the impact and relevance of their work. Competition for jobs both in and out of academia is fierce and these skills and activities often viewed as being ‘extras’ are actually fundamental for success in any career. But there is no reason why activities designed to enhance skills in public engagement, writing and teaching should be seen as separate entities to the research process.

I’m going to share an example from my PhD. I wanted to share my research work at an overseas conference. After my abstract was accepted I needed to raise funding in order to attend. My travel budget did not cover the full cost of the conference. At that point in my PhD I had already been blogging about my PhD and had spent time developing my writing skills through my editing role at the science magazine I co-founded with other students. I was invited by one of the societies at the conference to act as an official conference blogger. Continue reading