Intravenous vaccine for malaria offers robust protection in small clinical trial

mosquito

Almost half the world’s population lives in areas where malaria infection is a risk, yet no licensed vaccines exist to prevent this red blood cell parasite from causing almost half a million deaths each year. However, in a study published online today in Science, researchers report on a new vaccine that provided remarkable protection against Plasmodium falciparum, considered the deadliest of the four malaria strains.

“With this intravenous vaccine, we are striving to reach the World Health Organization goal of a [malaria] vaccine with 80 percent efficacy by 2025,” Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), in Bethesda, Maryland, told Nature Medicine. The clinical study was led by Robert Seder, an immunologist at the NIAID Vaccine Research Center, and involved a vaccine developed by Stephen Hoffman and his colleagues at Sanaria, a biotechnology company based in Rockville, Maryland.

Scientists have spent decades trying to block Plasmodium infections at different stages of the parasite’s life cycle—from the sporozoite that migrates out of the mosquito salivary gland and into host liver cells, to the merozoites that invade red blood cells before further developing into reproducing gametocytes.

To date, only one experimental vaccine, called RTS,S or Mosquirix, developed by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has demonstrated a consistent protective effect. It is made with a combination of antigens from part of a sporozoite and a hepatitis B virus surface receptor. Early results suggested that three doses of the vaccine could cut the risk of infection among children aged 5 months to 17 months by half. But last year the results of a phase 3 clinical trial indicated that it offered only about 30–35% protection when given to infants between 6 weeks and 12 weeks of age.

Seder and his colleagues set their sights on developing a vaccine with at least 80% efficacy and also decided to focus on stopping malarial infections at the sporozoite stage—before the parasite ever gets into the red blood cells. The phase 1 clinical trial reported today included a total of 34 adults completing a series of intravenous vaccines at varying doses, with the most promising results at the highest dose levels. Six adults who received five vaccine injections at the highest dose all showed complete protection after they were subsequently infected deliberately with P. falciparum, while six of nine adults who received a series of four of the high-dose vaccines experienced similar protection following the immunization schedule.

Continue reading

Malaria vaccine results present infant immunization quandary

{credit}CDC{/credit}

Babies receive a battery of vaccines after they’re born to protect them against dreaded diseases such as tetanus, whooping cough and polio. Public health officials in the developing world had hoped to soon add a malaria (Plasmodium falciparum) vaccine to the childhood immunization schedule to take advantage of the existing vaccine distribution system. However, new results from a trial of the leading candidate—a shot known as RTS,S, or Mosquirix—suggest that the vaccine reduces the risk of malaria by only a third in infants.

Given the low efficacy, some experts are now questioning whether RTS,S would be a useful addition to the childhood vaccination roster. John Lusingu, a malaria researcher at the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanga, Tanzania, and a principal investigator on the trial, points out that children six months and older are most affected by the disease, so it might make sense to administer the vaccine to older children, for whom the vaccine is more protective. But that would probably require an expansion of the routine immunization program to include additional clinic visits, which can be burdensome for health workers and families.

The vaccine’s developers, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, plan to push on with the phase 3 trial, which is slated to end in 2014. “This is not a mission we should just walk away from,” Andrew Witty, chief executive of GSK, said in a press conference on 9 November. The London-based company has spent approximately $300 million on RTS,S to date and expects to invest another $200 million before the project is finished.

The study, published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine, included more than 6,500 infants between 6 and 12 weeks old from across seven African countries. The vaccine reduced the risk of clinical episodes of malaria by 31% in this young cohort, a lower level than that found in children vaccinated between 5 and 17 months for whom the vaccine provided up to 56% protection.

Why the vaccine is less effective in infants than it is in toddlers isn’t yet clear, but the research team behind the trial has a number of hypotheses. One complicating factor could be antibodies passed on from the babies’ mothers during pregnancy. These maternal antibodies protect infants from disease, but they can also prevent vaccines from eliciting a strong immune response .

Those same antibodies decay over time, though, so the older group of children would probably have had lower levels of them, says Rick Fairhurst, chief of the malaria pathogenesis and human immunity unit at the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Rockville, Maryland. The effect could be especially pronounced in areas with the highest burden of malaria. Repeated exposure to the parasite results in higher levels of antibodies in the mothers, which can then be passed on to the children.

Continue reading