Let the (medical) games begin: A Q&A with Olympics health director Brian McCloskey

With just three weeks to go before the Olympic flame is officially lit in London, the UK’s Health Protection Agency (HPA) announced this week that it is “Games ready”, with a rapid-response system in place to keep spectators and athletes healthy. Over the course of the 16-day event, the public health body will pinpoint and respond to any emerging health hazards or infectious disease outbreaks that may occur among the 11 million ticketholders and 15,000 athletes expected to descend upon the British capital.

Leading the effort will be the Olympics lead health director Brian McCloskey, who is also the HPA’s regional director for London. A family doctor by training, McCloskey played a major role in the agency’s emergency response to the London tube bombings in 2005 and helped craft the public health preparedness guidelines for the 2004 Olympics in Athens. Ahead of this year’s Summer Games, McCloskey spoke with Nature Medicine about the HPA’s key preparations and overarching public health challenges for the 30th Olympiad.

Which infectious diseases will you be tracking during the Games?

We will monitor all infectious diseases, but the main ones that will likely be an issue for us will be gastrointestinal diseases such as food poisoning and infectious diseases such as measles. There have been measles outbreaks in Europe and in UK in the past couple of years and those haven’t gone away.

Continue reading

Achieving gender equality in academic careers: Queen’s case study

Does your university make provision for maternity leave in its PhD studentships? Does it insist on female representation on all committees, or run a buddy system linking female postdocs to female PhD students? These are just some of the initiatives in place at Queen’s University Belfast, which was recently named as the lead university in the United Kingdom for tackling the unequal representation of women in science.

Queen’s has been given a ‘Silver University’ award by the Athena SWAN Charter, a recognition scheme that rewards UK universities committed to advancing and promoting the careers of women working in science, engineering and technology (SET). It’s the highest level of award currently held in the United Kingdom, and Queen’s is the only university with the accolade. Tom Millar, dean of the faculty of engineering and physical sciences, says the university’s gender-equality initiatives are “part and parcel” of the regular business of the institution. “It is this integration, or mainstreaming, of an equal opportunities focus that has made our efforts sustainable,” he says.

Other examples of initiatives at Queen’s include:

  • Personal mentoring programme for female postdocs and academic staff
  • Monitoring of processes at all stages of recruitment and career development
  • Regular surveys, courses and workshops on aspects of academic careers
  • Profiling of female scientists on websites and in print
  • Teaching-free semester for staff returning from maternity leave

Yvonne Galligan, director of Queen’s Gender Initiative — which has been the main driver of recent progress since it was established in 1999 — says the university’s ambition is to create a gender-equal environment for staff and students. “Winning the institutional Silver award was not an ‘event’,” she says. “It is [one] stage in a process.”

To achieve a Gold award, the highest possible, Millar and Galligan say the university must extend its gender-equality success to its arts and humanities departments and do more to tackle the loss of female academics at key career stages the so-called ‘leaky pipeline’. It’s a process that will take time — Peter Mason from Athena SWAN explains that to be awarded Gold, a university would need the majority of its departments to hold individual Gold departmental awards. Currently only the department of chemistry at the University of York is at this level.

While Queen’s works towards this goal, Millar is understandably proud of the university’s achievement to date: “It is recognition of the enormous contribution and commitment, for more than a decade, of many staff, academic and non-academic, male and female.”

How does Queen’s compare to your institution for gender equality? Could you see similar initiatives being implemented where you work? Let us know your thoughts.