From this week’s issue of Nature, Correspondence page (Nature 447, 908; 2007).

Your News story ‘Anger at “unfit” museum design’ (Nature 447, 239; 2007) reports some people’s belief that the design of the Natural History Museum’s Darwin Centre Phase Two is unfit for purpose, as the building will not have room to house the entire insect and plant collection.

The crux of the issue is that the public is being given access to our science, and this takes space. Building new facilities for the entirety of our collections, research and public access in one go is not feasible, with current funding. Instead we are taking it by stages. With the completion of Darwin Centre Phase Two, we will have more than half of our 70 million specimens in high-quality storage.

Balancing the needs of collections, research and public access will help us to advance knowledge of the natural world and to communicate this to the public. It will mean some changes in how we work and it will take time to adjust. However, we think that the new building will lead to a long-term improvement in the way we carry out and communicate the museum’s work in taxonomy and systematics.

We have received a high level of support for this project, and are confident that it will be a real benefit to the museum, the scientific community and the wider public.

Richard Lane

Natural History Museum, London.

See here for the News story on which Dr Lane’s letter comments, which reports criticisms of the directors of the Natural History Museum over their plans to split parts of its world-renowned collection of biological specimens on a permanent basis. Some of the museum’s curators are angry that plans for a new building to store the bulk of the museum’s entomology and botany collections remain unaltered three years after being branded unfit for the purpose by museum staff, according to the News story.