Climate Feedback

Results cast doubt on potential ‘climate fix’

Cross posted from The Great Beyond

polarstern.jpgA controversial experiment which poured iron into the Southern Ocean has also poured cold water on the idea that such ‘ocean fertilization’ can mitigate against climate change.

The Lohafex project was investigating suggestions that carbon dioxide can be removed from the atmosphere by promoting algal blooms with iron. Despite protests from some groups, researchers aboard the Polarstern research vessel carried out their experiment this month.

However, the Alfred-Wegener institute, which was backing Lohafex, says “only a modest amount of carbon sank out of the surface layer by the end of the experiment. Hence, the transfer of CO2 from the atmosphere to the ocean to compensate the deficit caused by the LOHAFEX bloom was minor compared to earlier ocean iron fertilization experiments.”

Although the iron did initially stimulate plankton production, predation from small copepods prevented further growth. In addition, previous experiments have led to increases in diatom algae, which form silica shells that sink after the algal blooms, trapping the carbon.

The institute says previous, natural blooms had extracted all the silicic acid, preventing diatom growth. It adds:

Hence a major finding was that other algal groups, although stimulated by iron fertilization, are unable to make blooms equivalent to those of diatoms. Since the silicic acid content in the northern half of the Southern Ocean is low, iron fertilization in this vast region will not result in removal of significant amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere.


Kenneth Coale, director of Moss Landing Marine Laboratories in California, was more upbeat.

He told the BBC, “To date we’ve conducted experiments in what amounts to 0.04% of the ocean’s surface. All have indicated that iron is the key factor controlling phytoplankton growth, and most have indicated that there is carbon flux (towards the sea floor) – this is one that didn’t.”

Image top: Polarstern in the open sea. / Alfred-Wegener-Institut

Image lower: copepod / G. Mazzochi, SZN / Alfred Wegener Institute

Daniel Cressey


  1. Report this comment

    Tucker McKinney said:

    We can make a difference and I’m on a mission to spread the word! Our friends’ families and ours are taking the Great Carbon Challege to see which family can cut their carbon footprint in a month by the greatest %. Being a competitive family, we are enjoying the challenge. The website is Spread the word!

  2. Report this comment

    Margaret Cooney said:

    In the many articles I’ve read on “ocean fertilization” (including this one) there is very little reference to the impact that an increase in phytoplankton blooms would have on ocean ecosystems. For example, along the Great Barrier reef and other areas of the Indo-Pacific there is a coral-eating starfish, whose population outbreaks have been linked to phytoplankton blooms. These outbreaks have the potential to completely wipe out whole sections of a reef, which in turn could greatly effect the multitude of benefits that we receive from coral reefs (i.e. barriers to the impact of waves and storms, food and medicine, economic benefits to local communities, etc.). An increase in iron-induced phytoplankton blooms could exacerbate this particular phenomenon. This is just one example of the impact that an increase in these phytoplankton blooms could have. In other words it is important to consider whether or not this method of carbon dioxide removal leads to more problems then it solves.

Comments are closed.