Big data with Susanna-Assunta Sansone

susanna-sansone

With Big Data come big problems and big responsibilities. Digital Science recently ran a #datadramas tag on Twitter, asking scientists about their own data dramas. It’s scary, but what it and the Naturejobs poll show is that many scientists still use the laptops and USB sticks to store data long term. To talk about this, we spoke to Susanna-Assunta Sansone, the associate director of the University of Oxford e-Research Centre, and a data consultant and honorary academic editor for Scientific Data, a new open access data publication by Nature Publishing Group that launched this week.

The first question to tackle is: what is big data? Sansone says people often only mean size and volume, but from her point of view big data is also about “variety and complexity.  So, data is multidimensional. You have video, audio files, text files, you have physical specimens which you have recorded information about.”

Sansone is a biologist by training, and now works with life sciences data, of which there is an incredible amount, especially within the genomics fields of research. How scientists manage all this data varies on the data types, says Sansone. “There are different tools for different data types. And there are different enablers like terminology or format, which work for different data types.” If you are a newcomer to the field of life sciences, this can be incredibly confusing. There are some general tools that are available, and the one that is used most is Microsoft Excel. “It’s better than nothing, but there are better tools nowadays.” Continue reading

What skills do the University of Toronto department of immunology alumni take away from postgraduate courses?

contributors Yuriy Baglaenko and Eric Gracey

Students from the department of immunology at the University of Toronto recently completed a survey of their 288 alumni, tracking their career choices and progressions through life. In this post, Yuriy Baglaenko and Eric Gracey ask the alumni what they have done after leaving the University of Toronto, and which skills they learned there have come in useful in their careers.

As graduate students, we are both the consumers of education and the producers of knowledge, and the success of universities depends on the research we produce. Many university ranking systems disproportionately value research impact: the Time’s Higher Education University rankings has 30% of the ranking composed of publication citation impact and an additional 30% comprised of research volume, income and reputation. Yet, graduate students are considered trainees and by attending courses and conducting independent research, we are supposed to be preparing for the next chapters of our lives. In a recent survey from the Department of Immunology at the University of Toronto, we asked our 288 alumni to evaluate the effectiveness of that training.

In a previous NatureJobs blog post, we summarized the vocation and location trends uncovered in this survey. In this post, we ask how well graduate training the University of Toronto immunology department prepared our alumni for their chosen careers and pass along some of the comments that emerged.

NJB - A student led graduate alumni survey Part 2_v2

{credit}Yi-Min Chun{/credit}

Continue reading

#NJCEBoston – a review

Naturejobs team

{credit}David Fox{/credit}

On Tuesday May 20th the Naturejobs team hosted their first  international Career Expo in Boston. We’d like to give a big thank you to everyone who made it and we hope you managed to get a lot out of your day with us: making new contacts, become inspired and picking up some freebies!

As with our previous London-based Expos, we like to learn from your experiences to make sure that each time our Expo gets better and better; that you continue to gain career inspiration and insights from our conference speakers, and that you meet the right people at the exhibition. In order for us to do this, we would be delighted if you could give us some feedback. We will shortly be sending out some evaluation forms, but if you want to leave us some feedback now, please don’t hesitate to leave a comment below, use Twitter or Facebook, or email them directly to naturejobseditor[at]nature[dot]com. 

exhibition

{credit}David Fox{/credit}

We would also be very keen to know if any of your new contacts and networking opportunities lead to something further. Whether it is just an informational interview, a coffee or (wouldn’t this be a lovely) a job, we want to hear about it.

For those who couldn’t make it, there was plenty of live Tweeting on the day, and you can find many comments, thoughts and discussions under the #NJCEBoston tag. We will also be uploading our coverage of the day, thanks to our #NJCEBoston journalists. But just in case you can’t wait for those pieces, here are the three key points that people took away from the day:

Networking: it’s not a bad thing. There is absolutely nothing wrong with knowing people – it’s all about who you know, that’s how business works. Joanne Kamens from Addgene did a great presentation on this, and a write-up will follow shortly.

It’s all about the story: from the moment you start looking for a job to the moment you’re in the interview, it’s all about telling your stories. Interviewers dont want to hear facts, they want to know you, and your story.

Communication: according to both industry and academic experts, this was The most wanted transferable skill. After all, without any communication, nothing gets done.

But now that the Expo is over, take a look at our handy tips for how to follow up on your networking at a science careers fair: After the fair.

Where do all the alumni go?

Contributors Yuriy Baglaenko and Eric Gracey

Students from the department of immunology at the University of Toronto recently completed a survey of their 288 alumni, tracking their career choices and progressions through life. In this post, Yuriy Baglaenko and Eric Gracey follow the alumni around the globe, to see where they have ended up after leaving the University of Toronto.

The sub-prime mortgage crisis of 2008 had global economic ramifications, still felt to this day. This crisis was particularly close to the heart of business schools, which were criticized for not instilling the proper skills and ethics in their graduates. In response to this disaster, many MBA programs restructured to adapt their training by having continuous dialogues with industry and adding a stronger focus on softer skills.

Recent reports have provided evidence that the scientific system may also be facing an impending crash, with funding levels stagnant, grant success rates diving and an increasing reliance on trainees as producers of knowledge. Will graduate training preemptively change to avoid a scientific meltdown or continue to lag behind a changing world?

Why survey alumni?

Unfortunately, graduate training is rarely evaluated. New courses and technologies might come and go but fundamentally, graduate education has remained unchanged for many years. Only recently have a limited number of academic or industry track PhD programs been introduced to bring training in line with a changing job market. Continue reading

How to prepare for a science careers fair: After the event

_NJCE(Long)eps
The fair is over and you were a glowing success. Now it’s time to capitalise on the networking you did, those business cards you collected and CVs you handed out.

Always follow up with people you spoke to. Many of the recruiters will base their impressions of you on your continued conversation. Here are our top Do’s and Don’ts when it comes to follow-up letters:

  • DO send the email within 48 hours.
  • DON’T do it as you’re leaving the building: you don’t want to be too keen.
  • DO make it specific: mention something from the conversation that was memorable (e.g., a project that you did your homework on).
  • DON’T warble on about how amazing the science career fair was (although the Naturejobs Career Expo will be awesome).
  • DO proofread all emails you send out: spelling and grammatical mistakes will completely undermine all your efforts from the day.
  • DON’T send the wrong email: make sure you’ve got the name and organisation correct.
  • DO attach a CV where appropriate: if you didn’t have one on the day, and the recruiter asked for one, then it would be appropriate to attach one.
  • DON’T send a generic one: tailor it to the job role and company.

An example email may look like:

Dear Mr/Mrs/Dr [INSERT SURNAME],

It was great to meet you at the Naturejobs Career Expo in Boston yesterday. I’d like to thank you for taking some time to talk to me about [INSERT PROJECT NAME]; it’s a fascinating piece of work that I have been following for some time now. As I mentioned, this is a field that I am keen to enter, and your organisation appears to offer excellent opportunities for someone at my level.

I have followed your suggestion of [INSERT SUGGESTION – might be attach a CV, upload CV online etc]. I do hope this brings me one step closer to the job as a [INSERT JOB TITLE] you mentioned.

If you need anything else from me, please do not hesitate to call me at [INSERT PHONE NUMBER] or use this email address.

Yours sincerely,

[INSERT YOUR NAME]

Following these simple tips will hopefully get responses from all your conversations. And, fingers crossed, an interview or two.

Good luck!

How to ask the right questions when transitioning from academia to industry

MUSIC

{credit}PhotoDisc/ Getty Images{/credit}

Contributor David Proia

A career in the life sciences can be incredibly rewarding, more so if you are in the right environment with a solid leader. We have all seen or heard of the student who changed labs in their fifth year because of poor interactions with their mentor, the eight year postdoc too afraid to move on, the senior research associate unable to progress to the Scientist level because of degree requirements, or the scientist pigeonholed into doing the same type of work day in and day out. Some of these problems can be eliminated by doing due diligence prior to joining an academic lab or industry position and asking some key questions.

In looking back at my career path, I wanted to share some of the things that I learned in transitioning from academia to multiple industry positions, and some of the questions that I learned to ask along the way. Like most things, it is best done with music. Continue reading

Career Expo journalist competition winner: Prital Patel

Prital_natureblogs

{credit}Annie Tong{/credit}

Prital Patel is a PhD Candidate in Medical BioPhysics at the University of Toronto. She is funded by the Canadian Liver Foundation, and works on understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate liver development and cancer. Outside of the laboratory, she enjoys reading, exploring the outdoors, learning languages and camping. She also enjoys engaging and educating the lay audience about liver research and health on her Facebook page, The Science Behind Your LIVEr

On dealing with a devil-in-disguise boss

We’ve all played that scenario in our head where we storm into our supervisor’s office and give them a piece of our mind. Don’t do it. Preserving the credibility of your work experience, and obtaining stellar references without holes in your CV will be important to advance your chosen career path, whether inside or outside of academia. Impulsive reactions can sabotage this and so try to take a more strategic and professional approach.

A bad supervisor can impact your professional development, morale and motivation. Learning how to deal with one  can help you to actively work towards addressing some of the issues and hopefully improve your work environment.

Start a conversation

In a world of diverse personalities, conflicts between people are inevitable. Keep this in mind and gather some colleagues and friends and get together once a month to talk things over and learn from each other about working in your lab or company, and how you have had to handle different people. Each month, let a different person discuss their concerns and how they could be addressed. This forms a support system, builds a team and opportunities for cross-collaboration.

These meetings may help pinpoint if a situation is getting out of hand earlier than you might have realised. In such cases, you can reach out and speak to a human resources advisor.

Log everything

Misunderstandings and false accusations can be detrimental relationships and progress within an academic institution or in industry. Covering your bases by leaving a paper or electronic trail can be a useful tool in preventing false allegations as well as increasing work efficiency.

Start a system of communication where tasks are assigned by emails, using written deadlines over verbal ones. If tasks are assigned through verbal communication, follow up with an email stating exactly what you were asked to do.

There are several different scenarios where this could come in useful. Your supervisor/boss might have assigned you tasks Y and Z, whilst they complete task X. If these things aren’t written down, it can be easy to forget who is supposed to be doing what. By keeping an accurate record of your assignments, you can make sure that you won’t get into trouble further down the line if your boss accuses you of not completing task X.

A simple email with, “Thanks for agreeing to complete task X, I will make sure to get tasks Y and Z done,” will provide immunity.

Keep working hard

Bad work relationships can sabotage morale and motivation. Avoid getting caught in a downward spiral by clearing out negative thoughts, and writing your short and long term goals. This will help you progress and keep you focused. Then once you reach those goals, reward yourself for your achievements. Moreover, better productivity or new ideas that may spring from this, and can be a game-changer in many mentor-mentee or boss-worker relationships.

 Broaden your internal network

Higher management or department heads often see the company and its employees in a broader perspective. They may be able to assist you by pinpointing where in the company your skills fit in. Furthermore, it would be important to consider building alternative sources to serve as references for your work. Set up a meeting with higher management and ask whether you can allocate a certain percentage of your work-time or spare-time to learning and shadowing people in other departments. This allows for mobility within the company, should an opening come up. It also shows initiative at your end to your superiors and can serve as a networking tool within your company.

Keep looking

While you can try and address the problems without pointing fingers and being strategic, in the interest of productivity and professional development, continue to network and apply for other positions that may interest you.

Stay on good terms

In a highly interconnected work environment, it is important to avoid burning bridges. So even if your current supervisor isn’t working out for you, try not to leave on a bad note.

Follow the Career Expo action on Twitter using the #NJCEBoston hashtag.

Spotlight on Women in Science with Sofie Carsten Nielsen

Sofie Carsten Nielsen

{credit}Kim Vadskær {/credit}

Naturejobs is celebrating Women in Science. Every day this week we’re interviewing an inspirational female scientist. Yesterday, we spoke to Edwina Dunn, founder of dunnhumby and the Tesco Club card.

So far, each of the women in the spotlight series have studied some form of science subject (I’m now including geography is in this group too); some of them have faced barriers in their careers, and all of them are doing things to help other women in science avoid these barriers entirely.

Today’s interview, the final part of the series, is with Sofie Carsten Nielsen, the Danish Minister for Higher Education and Science. Although the minister doesn’t have a science background, she is incredibly keen to help Danish female scientists shine in their academic system, and is putting several plans in place to make this happen.

“I didn’t plan to become a politician. Maybe subconsciously, I actually tried to avoid becoming a politician…but in the end I just couldn’t resist.” Sofie believes that being in the position to help drive higher education and science forward is one of the most interesting of all. “That’s the future.” Continue reading

Motherhood and science

Kay and Keeva at SFN

Kay and Keeva at SFN{credit}Courtesy Kay Tye{/credit}

Dr Kay Tye, from the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, recently had a baby. Keeva is now 10 months old, and has been to the lab, on multiple trips around the world, and even gets a photo in Nature before her first birthday. In March 2013, Kay featured alongside other fantastic female scientists in the Nature article: From the frontline: 30 something science. At the time, Kay was 5 months pregnant, and was just beginning to dial down her work levels to prepare for her daughter. I caught up with her, just over a year later, to see whether her opinions on having a child whilst being a scientist had changed.

What response did you get from the article in Nature?

I got mixed responses from both ends of the spectrum.  Some people really liked that I wasn’t afraid to admit I have other interests besides science, others were critical of the “one can have it all” attitude.  Specifically, I was criticised for being “dismissive” of the amount of work parenthood entails. Some said that it would have been more appropriate to feature someone who already had children.

I have always wanted to be a mother, and have always looked up to women with successful careers and families, and never intended for my comments to come off as dismissive in any way.  I always worried about if I would be able to make it work, and tried to focus on my mentors and role-models (including my mom, my PhD advisor, and other leaders in my field) who have had successful careers and happy families. Continue reading

Spotlight on Women in Science with Edwina Dunn

Edwina-DunnNaturejobs is celebrating Women in Science. Every day this week we’re interviewing an inspirational female scientist. Yesterday, we spoke to Una Ryan, an angel investor and the chair of the Bay Area Bioeconomy Initiative.

Today we’re in conversation with Edwina Dunn, co-founder of dunnhumby which pioneered Tesco Club card, and is now newly starting an enterprise called Starcount, looking at data analytics in the social media space.

Big Data and social media: two of the biggest buzz words, two of the most complicated concepts of the modern digital era, and Edwina is combining them. “I think we’ve always been in big data and hadn’t really appreciated it.”

When Edwina met her partner Clive Humby they were working on population statistics, studying how people grouped together in neighbourhoods: You are where you live.

“Then we moved onto shopping data and that’s you are what you eat.” When it comes to social media analytics, there are 1.7billion fans Tweeting, Facebooking, blogging, and sharing every day; hence I automatically came out with the phrase: You are what you say. But this isn’t what Starcount is looking at. “You are what you follow: we’re interested in leaders and followers, communities of interest. So what kind of stars, what brands to people follow?” Continue reading