Cross posted from Nature Medicine’s Spoonful of Medicine blog on behalf of Meera Swami
In 2009, the US Congress pledged $1.1 billion to improve comparative effectiveness research, a field dedicated to side-by-side evaluations of how drugs perform. The key question is whether new medicines really offer any improvements over the current standard of care at their time of approval. Without this information, are clinicians equipped to make the best treatment decisions?
Such concerns are reinforced by a study published yesterday in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicating that over the past decade approximately half of the new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not have publically available information on their comparative effectiveness when they were approved.
Read the rest of this post on Spoonful of Medicine.
Recent comments on this blog
Experiments reveal that crabs and lobsters feel pain
US research ethics agency upholds decision on informed consent
Chemistry credit disputes under the spotlight
Chemistry credit disputes under the spotlight
Contamination created controversial ‘acid-induced’ stem cells