{"id":1161,"date":"2011-02-24T13:07:34","date_gmt":"2011-02-24T13:07:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2011\/02\/costs-prevent-doctors-from-adopting-electronic-health-records.html"},"modified":"2011-02-24T13:07:34","modified_gmt":"2011-02-24T13:07:34","slug":"costs_prevent_doctors_from_ado","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2011\/02\/costs_prevent_doctors_from_ado.html","title":{"rendered":"Costs prevent doctors from adopting electronic health records"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"ehr.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/files\/ehr.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" align=\"right\" hspace=\"10px\"><\/p>\n<p>Two years ago, the US government set aside close to $20 billion in stimulus funds to encourage hospitals and physicians to digitize their patient records as a way to save time and reduce doctor mistakes. But according to a survey published this week, most physicians remain wary of the price of going electronic.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.athenahealth.com\/index.php?open=26\">survey<\/a> of 500 American health practitioners, conducted by the web-based medical practice management company <a href=\"https:\/\/www.athenahealth.com\/\">athenahealth<\/a>, found that 75% of physicians think that so-called electronic health records (EHRs) can improve patient care, yet 88% said that costs remain a big issue for implementation.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, establishing a new electronic medical record system <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/nm\/journal\/v16\/n3\/full\/nm0310-251b.html\">can set back a physician up to $124,000<\/a>, according to a 2009 study by the advisory firm Avalere Health.<\/p>\n<p>However, such hefty investments up front can pay off in the long run. For example, a <a href=\"https:\/\/newsroom.cdwg.com\/features\/feature-12-13-10.html\">December 2010 survey<\/a> from <A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.cdwg.com\/default.aspx?Seg=7\"><span class=\"caps\">CDW<\/span> Healthcare<\/A> found that medical practices can rake in as much as $151,000 per physician per year in cost savings once EHRs are put in place.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s more, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.childrenshospital.org\/cfapps\/research\/data_admin\/Site108\/mainpageS108P0.html\">Kenneth Mandl<\/a>, an informatics researcher at Children&#8217;s Hospital Boston, the cost of adopting EHRs can be reduced dramatically if the systems keep pace with emerging technology \u2014 for instance, by creating <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMp0900411\">smart phone-like apps<\/a> for managing medical records. \u201cThese applications can flexibly evolve with the clinician and with health reform,\u201d Mandl told <EM>Nature Medicine<\/EM>.<\/p>\n<p>To read more about EHRs, check out our recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.childrenshospital.org\/cfapps\/research\/data_admin\/Site108\/mainpageS108P0.html\">news focus<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><EM>Image: <span class=\"caps\">CDC<\/span><\/EM><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two years ago, the US government set aside close to $20 billion in stimulus funds to encourage hospitals and physicians to digitize their patient records as a way to save time and reduce doctor mistakes. But according to a survey published this week, most physicians remain wary of the price of going electronic. The survey of 500 American health practitioners, conducted by the web-based medical practice management company athenahealth, found that 75% of physicians think that so-called electronic health records (EHRs) can improve patient care, yet 88% said that costs remain a big issue for implementation. Indeed, establishing a new&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2011\/02\/costs_prevent_doctors_from_ado.html#wpn-more-1161\" class=\"more-link\"> &hellip; Read more<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2011\/02\/costs_prevent_doctors_from_ado.html\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":127,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-policy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/127"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1161\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}