{"id":278,"date":"2007-02-27T17:59:54","date_gmt":"2007-02-27T17:59:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2007\/02\/sorry-times-for-indian-science.html"},"modified":"2011-12-15T18:57:23","modified_gmt":"2011-12-15T18:57:23","slug":"sorry_times_for_indian_science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2007\/02\/sorry_times_for_indian_science.html","title":{"rendered":"Sorry times for Indian science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Something strange&#8212;and embarassing&#8212;has happened in India.<\/p>\n<p>For the past few weeks, Novartis has been fighting a lawsuit in India that could affect the availability of cheap drugs worldwide. The lawsuit challenges India&#8217;s decision to interpret <span class=\"caps\">WTO<\/span> rules and only honor patents on drugs that are entirely new, not just derivatives or variations of existing drugs.<\/p>\n<p>This clause allows Indian companies to make cheap copies that they then sell all over the world. The case is still being heard, although high-profile voices, including nonprofit group <span class=\"caps\">MSF<\/span> (Doctors Without Borders) and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oversight.house.gov\/Documents\/20070213183300-13686.pdf\">Henry Waxman<\/a>, chair of the influential US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, have asked Novartis to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2007\/070115\/full\/070115-1.html\">drop the suit<\/a>. More than 250,000 people have signed the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.msf.org\/petition_india\/usa.html\"><span class=\"caps\">MSF<\/span> petition<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, the Indian government had asked a high-level committee, including R.A. Mashelkar, who retired last year as Director General of India&#8217;s Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and is arguably one of the most respected Indian scientists, to look into the patent issue. After nearly two years&#8217; deliberations, the committee  produced a report on the law that is favorable to Novartis.<\/p>\n<p>But get this: an Indian newspaper discovered that the crucial bits of the report were plagiarized from a paper published by a think tank in the UK and funded by <span class=\"caps\">INTERPAT<\/span>, an association of pharma companies whose members include Novartis. Mashelkar says he didn&#8217;t know about the plagiarism and has withdrawn the report, asking for three months to review it. I buy that he didn&#8217;t know about the plagiarism and that it might have crept in when the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hindu.com\/2007\/02\/22\/stories\/2007022206751200.htm\">&#8220;draft was being worked on by a sub-group&#8221;<\/a> but the larger issue is the potentially biased source of the original conclusions.<\/p>\n<p>The government hasn&#8217;t yet said whether it will accept the revised report, but any way you slice it, this is a deeply embarassing incident for Indian science. Earlier this month, Nature <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2007\/070212\/full\/445683a.html\">challenged<\/a> Indian scientists to speak up and help shape policies. This is an inauspicious start indeed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Something strange\u2014and embarassing\u2014has happened in India.&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2007\/02\/sorry_times_for_indian_science.html#wpn-more-278\" class=\"more-link\">Read more<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2007\/02\/sorry_times_for_indian_science.html\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":249,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drugs-drugs-and-more-drugs","category-world-watch"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/249"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}