{"id":418,"date":"2008-07-02T14:10:06","date_gmt":"2008-07-02T14:10:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2008\/07\/screening-sunscreens.html"},"modified":"2008-07-02T14:10:06","modified_gmt":"2008-07-02T14:10:06","slug":"waiting_for_the_word_on_sunscr_1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2008\/07\/waiting_for_the_word_on_sunscr_1.html","title":{"rendered":"Screening sunscreens"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A watchdop group has called on the US Food and Drug Administration to shed some light on sunscreens. The government agency has failed to finalize standards for testing and labeling sunscreens, says a <a href=\"https:\/\/cosmeticsdatabase.com\/special\/sunscreens2008\/index.php\">report<\/a> by the Washington, DC-based nonprofit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ewg.org\">Environmental Working Group<\/a>. The report also concludes that 85% of sunscreens on the market either contain potentially toxic ingredients or fail to provide enough protection from both <span class=\"caps\">UVB<\/span> and <span class=\"caps\">UVA<\/span> radiation. Most products shield the skin from <span class=\"caps\">UVB<\/span> rays, which cause sunburn as well as <span class=\"caps\">DNA<\/span> damage associated with skin cancer.<\/p>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fasebj.org\/Press_Room\/July2008PressRelease.shtml\">study published yesterday<\/a> in the journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (<span class=\"caps\">FASEB<\/span>), provides details to support the idea that <span class=\"caps\">UVB<\/span> rays are more likely to cause cancer. However, research published in May suggests that the deeper-penetrating <span class=\"caps\">UVA<\/span> rays that cause skin aging also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/18410801?ordinalpos=10&#038;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum\">suppress the immune system<\/a>, compromising the body\u2019s ability to protect itself against the development and spread of skin cancer.<\/p>\n<p>The <span class=\"caps\">FDA<\/span> is currently considering sunscreen labeling changes to help consumers make better choices, but in the meantime, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aad.org\/\">American Academy of Dermatology<\/a> offers this advice: Use broad spectrum sunscreen products of <span class=\"caps\">SPF<\/span> 15 that protect against <span class=\"caps\">UVA<\/span> and <span class=\"caps\">UVB<\/span> rays. Lather it on everyday and wear protective clothing.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"sunscreen.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/files\/sunscreen.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"320\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Image by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/daquellamanera\/\">Daquella manera<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A watchdop group has called on the US Food and Drug Administration to shed some light on sunscreens. The government agency has failed to finalize standards for testing and labeling sunscreens, says a report by the Washington, DC-based nonprofit Environmental Working Group. The report also concludes that 85% of sunscreens on the market either contain potentially toxic ingredients or fail to provide enough protection from both UVB and UVA radiation. Most products shield the skin from UVB rays, which cause sunburn as well as DNA damage associated with skin cancer.&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2008\/07\/waiting_for_the_word_on_sunscr_1.html#wpn-more-418\" class=\"more-link\">Read more<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2008\/07\/waiting_for_the_word_on_sunscr_1.html\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":164,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/164"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}