{"id":5425,"date":"2013-10-11T12:20:44","date_gmt":"2013-10-11T16:20:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/?p=5425"},"modified":"2013-10-11T12:21:20","modified_gmt":"2013-10-11T16:21:20","slug":"natural-virus-killing-rna-mechanism-found-in-mammals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2013\/10\/natural-virus-killing-rna-mechanism-found-in-mammals.html","title":{"rendered":"Natural virus-killing RNA mechanism found in mammals"},"content":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s Nobel week. And while all eyes are on this year\u2019s winners<\/a> of the medicine\/physiology prize for their work on cell transport mechanisms, it\u2019s worth looking back at another\u00a0award granted seven years ago to the discoverers of RNA interference (RNAi<\/a>), the biological process by which small RNA molecules inhibit gene expression. In recent years, various RNAi therapies have entered clinical trials, including one that researchers reported<\/a> earlier this month can drastically reduce cholesterol levels. But although scientists know that the biological machinery for RNAi is conserved in humans and can be exploited for therapeutic purposes it has been unclear whether the system is ever put into play under natural circumstances like it is in plants and invertebrates.<\/p>\n

\"Nvirus\"<\/a>Now, a pair<\/a> of papers<\/a> published in today\u2019s issue of Science<\/em> offers the most concrete evidence to date that humans and other mammals indeed use RNA to fight off their viral intruders. \u201cThis work is very important, because there\u2019s no longer a question that mammals ever have an RNA-based antiviral response,\u201d says Chris Sullivan<\/a>, an RNA researcher at the University of Texas at Austin who was not involved in the research.<\/p>\n

In these new studies, researchers from the University of California\u2013Riverside (UCR) and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich infected either mice or embryonic mouse cells with a type of mosquito-transmissible RNA virus called the Nodamura virus (pictured here). After infection, they observed the accumulation of short RNA strands with all the signature features of an antiviral RNAi response. A viral protein called B2 could block the production of a host cell\u2019s interfering RNA. But without this protein, the viruses were cleared by the RNAi mechanism\u2014both in vitro<\/i>, as the Zurich team showed, and in vivo<\/i>, as demonstrated by the California researchers.<\/p>\n

Although scientists have looked for this type of mechanism in mammals before, they\u2019ve come up empty handed. Shou-Wei Ding<\/a>, a UCR microbiologist who was involved in both research efforts, thinks those negative results probably arose because previous studies used viruses that inhibited RNAi, as Nodamura does if its B2 protein is intact. \u201cThis mechanism has been hidden from us until we were able to remove the suppressor the virus uses to block the antiviral RNA production,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n

Ding says it\u2019s far too early to say whether this research could yield a druggable pathway. The next steps are to look for the suppressors that other viruses may use to block this line of RNA defense.<\/p>\n