{"id":896,"date":"2010-07-21T15:30:30","date_gmt":"2010-07-21T15:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2010\/07\/avandia-update-trial-suspended-panelists-conflicted-mechanism-discovered.html"},"modified":"2010-07-21T15:30:30","modified_gmt":"2010-07-21T15:30:30","slug":"avandia_update_trial_suspended","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2010\/07\/avandia_update_trial_suspended.html","title":{"rendered":"Avandia update: trial suspended, panelists conflicted, mechanism discovered"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The US Food and Drug Administration (<span class=\"caps\">FDA<\/span>) may have <a href=\" https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/nm\/spoonful\/2010\/07\/after_avandia_some_seek_split.html\">voted to keep Avandia<\/a> on the shelf, but the agency remains worried enough about the beleaguered diabetes drug to tell GlaxoSmithKline, Avandia\u2019s manufacturer, to momentarily halt its use in a clinical trial. Today, the <span class=\"caps\">FDA<\/span> told the pharma giant that its ongoing study, called <a href=\"https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT00879970?term=TIDE&#038;rank=1\"><span class=\"caps\">TIDE<\/span><\/a>, which compares Avandia (rosiglitazone) to its chief competitor, Takeda Pharmaceuticals\u2019 Actos (pioglitazone), would be <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/Drugs\/DrugSafety\/ucm219780.htm\">placed on partial clinical hold<\/a>. This means that no new subjects can be recruited, but currently enrolled patients can continue treatment.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, two possible conflicts of interest with members of the <span class=\"caps\">FDA<\/span> advisory panels have emerged over the past few days. The Wall Street Journal <a href=\"https:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704720004575377552600421936.html\">found<\/a> that David Capuzzi, one of the three panelists who voted to leave Avandia on market with no new warnings, was paid $14,750 by <span class=\"caps\">GSK<\/span>, at least $6,750 of which came after 2008. Capuzzi says he was paid to speak about lipid-lowering drug named Lovaza, but a <span class=\"caps\">GSK<\/span> spokesman told <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pharmalot.com\/2010\/07\/an-undisclosed-conflict-on-the-fda-avandia-panel\/\">Pharmalot<\/a> that at least one talk prior to 2008 was for Avandia.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nOn the opposite end of the vote, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pharmalot.com\/2010\/07\/doctor-paid-by-takeda-was-on-fda-avandia-panel\/\">Abraham Thomas<\/a>, one of twelve members of the panel who recommended withdrawing Avandia from the market, was paid $2,000-$3,000 by Takeda Pharmaceuticals between 2007 and 2008. The FDA is currently investigating possible conflicts of interest for Capuzzi but not Thomas, since all payments he received from Takeda were more than a year before the advisory panel. Results from that investigation could come by the end of the week.<\/p>\n<p>And last, there\u2019s a new paper published online today in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v466\/n7305\/full\/nature09291.html#\/action-of-ppar-ggr-\"><em>Nature<\/em><\/a> that sheds some light on how, exactly, diabetes drugs like <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2010\/07\/avandia_vs_actos.html\">Avandia and Actos<\/a> work \u2014 and how safer ones could be made. They belong to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/nm\/journal\/v16\/n6\/full\/nm0610-614b.html\">class of drugs nicknamed \u201cglitazones\u201d<\/a>, which were discovered in the 1980s when they were found to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/6354790\">lower blood sugar in mice<\/a>. Glitazones were thought to improve insulin sensitivity by binding to a cell nucleus receptor called peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma), but details beyond that were sketchy.<\/p>\n<p>Now a team from Harvard Medical School has discovered that the <a href=\" https:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2010\/100721\/full\/466420a.html\">mechanism of interest<\/a> is actually the addition of a phosphate to PPAR-gamma by a protein kinase called Cdk5. This suggests an alternative avenue for the development of more specific diabetes drugs by focusing solely on Cdk5, possibly avoiding the cardiovascular side effects of glitazones.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2010\/100721\/full\/466420a\/box\/1.html\">timeline<\/A> to the glitazone family from tomorrow\u2019s issue of <em>Nature<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2010\/100721\/full\/466420a\/box\/1.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"timeline_glitazones.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/files\/timeline_glitazones.jpg\" width=\"650\" height=\"134\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may have voted to keep Avandia on the shelf, but the agency remains worried enough about the beleaguered diabetes drug to tell GlaxoSmithKline, Avandia\u2019s manufacturer, to momentarily halt its use in a clinical trial. Today, the FDA told the pharma giant that its ongoing study, called TIDE, which compares Avandia (rosiglitazone) to its chief competitor, Takeda Pharmaceuticals\u2019 Actos (pioglitazone), would be placed on partial clinical hold. This means that no new subjects can be recruited, but currently enrolled patients can continue treatment.&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2010\/07\/avandia_update_trial_suspended.html#wpn-more-896\" class=\"more-link\">Read more<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/2010\/07\/avandia_update_trial_suspended.html\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drugs-drugs-and-more-drugs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/spoonful\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}